Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context and Innovation Performance: A Meta-Analysis

被引:78
|
作者
Rosenbusch, Nina [1 ]
Gusenbauer, Michael
Hatak, Isabella
Fink, Matthias
Meyer, Klaus E.
机构
[1] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Lazaridis Sch Business & Econ, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Innovat Management, Linz, Austria
[3] Univ St Gallen, Swiss Res Inst Small Business & Entrepreneurship, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Univ Twente, Netherlands Inst Knowledge Intens Entrepreneurshi, Enschede, Netherlands
[5] Western Univ, Ivey Business Sch, London, ON, Canada
关键词
innovation offshoring; innovation performance; institutional arbitrage; institutional theory; meta-analysis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; HOME COUNTRY INSTITUTIONS; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; FIRM INNOVATION; VALUE CHAIN; DETERMINANTS; BUSINESS; INTERNATIONALIZATION; COEVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1111/joms.12407
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Innovation offshoring (IO) has become a widespread management practice. Yet, evidence on the performance implications is inconsistent, and scattered across disciplines and contexts. We argue that the benefits firms can derive from IO depend on the institutional environment at home. Drawing on recent work on institutional theory in international business, we explore institutions that facilitate reverse knowledge transfer and/or institutional arbitrage with respect to innovation-related activities. The results of our meta-analysis that synthesizes evidence from 48 samples show that IO is related positively to innovation performance. As predicted, this relationship is moderated by differences in the institutional environments across countries. Specifically, when national innovation systems are weak at home, IO appears to enable institutional arbitrage strategy whereas Confucian cultures enable more effective reverse knowledge transfer. However, contrary to our expectations, the beneficial effects of IO appear to have diminished over time.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 233
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technological Innovation, Firm Performance, and Institutional Context: A Meta-Analysis
    Singhal, Cherry
    Mahto, Raj, V
    Kraus, Sascha
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (06) : 2976 - 2986
  • [2] A meta-analysis of the impact of open innovation on performance
    Thi Phuong Thao Nguyen
    Huang, Fang
    Tian, Xiaowen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 2021,
  • [3] INNOVATION, FIRM PERFORMANCE, AND APPROPRIATION: A META-ANALYSIS
    Rousseau, Mary Beth
    Mathias, Blake D.
    Madden, Laura T.
    Crook, T. Russell
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 20 (03)
  • [4] A meta-analysis of environmental innovation and firm performance
    Liao, Zhongju
    Liu, Ping
    Liu, Shuchun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 64 (11) : 2047 - 2065
  • [5] INNOVATION IN LEASING AND LEASING OF INNOVATION: A META-ANALYSIS
    Gadzhi, Zeynalov Zakir
    [J]. MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS, 2020, (04): : 202 - 218
  • [6] Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs
    Rosenbusch, Nina
    Brinckmann, Jan
    Bausch, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2011, 26 (04) : 441 - 457
  • [7] Governance choice misfit and firm performance in offshoring innovation: the role of institutional environment
    Hong, Jie
    Massini, Silvia
    Edler, Jakob
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2022, 52 (05) : 970 - 991
  • [8] Network centrality, organizational innovation, and performance: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Haifeng
    Zhao, Jie
    Li, Yuan
    Li, Chuanjia
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, 2015, 32 (03): : 146 - 159
  • [9] The impact of service innovation on firm performance: a meta-analysis
    Feng, Changli
    Ma, Ruize
    Jiang, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 32 (03) : 289 - 314
  • [10] Ongoing innovation in meta-analysis
    Knottnerus, J. Andre
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (02) : 117 - 118