Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: A practical guide

被引:14
|
作者
Nahm, Eun-Shim [1 ]
Vaydia, Vinay [2 ]
Ho, Donny [2 ]
Scharf, Barbara [1 ]
Seagull, Jake [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Healthcare information systems (HIS) play a vital role in quality of care and the organization's daily operations. Consequently, increasing numbers of clinicians have been involved in HIS implementation, particularly for clinical information systems (CIS). Implementation of these systems is a major organizational investment, and its outcomes must be assessed. The purpose of this article is to provide clinicians and frontline informaticians with a practical guide to assess these outcomes, focusing on outcome variables, assessment methods, and timing of assessment. Based on in-depth literature reviews and their empirical experiences, the authors identified 3 frequently used outcomes: user satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and financial impact. These outcomes have been assessed employing various methods, including randomized controlled trials, pre- and post-test studies, time and motion studies, surveys, and user testing. The timing for outcomes assessments varied depending on several factors, such as learning curves or patients conditions. In conclusion, outcomes assessment is essential for the success of healthcare information technology, and the CIS implementation team members must be prepared to conduct and/or facilitate these studies.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 288
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anesthesia Information Management System Implementation: A Practical Guide
    Muravchick, Stanley
    Caldwell, James E.
    Epstein, Richard H.
    Galati, Maria
    Levy, Warren J.
    O'Reilly, Michael
    Plagenhoef, Jeffrey S.
    Rehman, Mohamed
    Reich, David L.
    Vigoda, Michael M.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (05): : 1598 - 1608
  • [2] A Practical Guide to Information Literacy Assessment for Academic Librarians
    Lindsay, Margot
    [J]. LIBRARY REVIEW, 2009, 58 (01) : 74 - +
  • [3] A practical guide to information literacy assessment for academic librarians
    Vacek, Rachel
    Radcliff, Caroyln J.
    [J]. REFERENCE & USER SERVICES QUARTERLY, 2008, 47 (04) : 405 - 405
  • [4] A practical guide to information literacy assessment for academic librarians
    Millet, Michelle S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2008, 34 (01): : 80 - 80
  • [5] Practical Guide to Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Davidson, Giana H.
    Haukoos, Jason S.
    Feldman, Liane S.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (05) : 432 - 433
  • [6] Clinical neuropsychology - A practical guide to assessment and management for clinicians
    Exner, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (02) : 215 - 215
  • [7] A Practical Guide to Information Literacy Assessment for Academic Librarians.
    Oakleaf, Megan
    [J]. LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2008, 30 (04) : 324 - 325
  • [8] COSHH assessment implementation by industry - A practical guide for the metal finishing industry
    Bridger, P
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF METAL FINISHING, 2002, 80 : B5 - B5
  • [9] COSHH assessment implementation by industry A practical guide for the metal finishing industry
    Bridger, Penny
    [J]. Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing, 2002, 80 (01):
  • [10] Practical Guide to Implementation Science
    Neuman, Heather B.
    Kaji, Amy H.
    Haut, Elliott R.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (05) : 434 - 435