Does a Prior Alliance with the Target Affect Acquisition Performance? The Dangers of a Honeymoon before Marriage

被引:4
|
作者
Meschi, Pierre-Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Metais, Emmanuel [3 ]
Shimizu, Katsuhiko [4 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, IAE Aix Marseille CERGAM, Chemin Quille, F-13540 Aix En Provence, France
[2] Skema Business Sch, Chemin Quille, F-13540 Aix En Provence, France
[3] EDHEC Business Sch, Lille, France
[4] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Business Adm, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
acquisition; pre-acquisition alliance; organizational learning theory; honeymoon period; negative transfer; event history analysis; INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES; M-AND-A; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; VALUE CREATION; UNITED-STATES; FIRMS LEARN; EXPERIENCE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1111/emre.12127
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Drawing from organizational learning theory, extant literature argues that a pre-acquisition alliance between an acquirer and its target is usually expected to have a positive impact on subsequent acquisition performance. Yet, since alliances and acquisitions are partially dissimilar events, negative transfer effects can bias inter-partner learning and negatively affect acquisition performance. To fill this gap, our paper explores pre-acquisition alliance duration and examines its effects on acquisition outcomes. We argue that a pre-acquisition alliance can have either beneficial or detrimental effects on subsequent acquisition performance, depending on the duration of the pre-acquisition alliance. We examine our hypotheses using a (1988-2008) panel database covering acquisitions by French firms in the US. We show an inverted U-shaped relationship between the duration of a pre-acquisition alliance and the probability of acquisition failure. Our results also indicate that this non-monotonic relationship is partially moderated by the degree of partner commitment to the alliance.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 444
页数:18
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Can a previous alliance between an acquirer and a target affect acquisition performance?
    Porrini, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2004, 30 (04) : 545 - 562
  • [2] The effect of prior alliance experience on acquisition performance
    Chang, Shao-Chi
    Tsai, Ming-Tse
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 (06) : 765 - 773
  • [3] How does a partner's acquisition affect the value of the firm's alliance with that partner?
    Lavie, Dovev
    Lunnan, Randi
    Truong, Binh Minh T.
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (09) : 1897 - 1926
  • [4] Does target geographical complexity impact acquisition performance
    Chkir, Imed
    Dutta, Shantanu
    Hassan, Boushra El Haj
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 33
  • [5] Does environmental, social and governance performance affect acquisition premium?
    Zrigui, Mouna
    Khanchel, Imen
    Lassoued, Naima
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND STRATEGY, 2024, 34 (04) : 469 - 494
  • [6] How does trust affect alliance performance? The mediating role of resource sharing
    Jiang, Xu
    Jiang, Feifei
    Cai, Xinlei
    Liu, Heng
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2015, 45 : 128 - 138
  • [7] Cohabitation before marriage: do prior alliances enhance post-merger performance?
    Zhaozhao He
    Han Yu
    Lijing Du
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2020, 54 : 1315 - 1349
  • [8] Cohabitation before marriage: do prior alliances enhance post-merger performance?
    He, Zhaozhao
    Yu, Han
    Du, Lijing
    [J]. REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2020, 54 (04) : 1315 - 1349
  • [9] Does prior knowledge of a no-KR retention test affect retention performance?
    Anderson, DI
    Sierra, N
    Schleihauf, R
    Biagini, T
    Heywood, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 22 : S15 - S15
  • [10] Dating before marriage? Analyzing the influence of pre-acquisition experience and target familiarity on acquisition success in the "M&A as R&D" type of acquisition
    Al-Laham, Andreas
    Schweizer, Lars
    Amburgey, Terry L.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 26 (01) : 25 - 37