The Price of Individual and Institutional Self-Censorship

被引：0
|
作者：
La Noue, George R. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Sch Publ Policy, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
来源：
SOCIETY | 2019年 / 56卷 / 06期
关键词：
Self-censorship; Bias response teams; Judicial free campus speech affrimations; Lack of campus public policy debates; Forums with diverse viewpoints;
D O I：
10.1007/s12115-019-00418-w
中图分类号：
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
While self-censorship is a necessary part of everyday social life, suppression of campus speech is inconsistent with academic freedom. Such suppression may take the form of speech disruptions and disinvitations, but it may also be the result of speech codes and bias response teams. These practices may lead to judical remedies. Campus self-censorship in the form of the refusal to sponsor campus public policy debates or forums with diverse viewpoints can only be remedied when higher education adopts models of civil disagreement about important public policy issues.
引用
收藏
页码：577 / 580
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
12345