Predictors of repeat participation in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme

被引:23
|
作者
Lo, S. H. [1 ]
Halloran, S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Snowball, J. [2 ]
Seaman, H. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wardle, J. [1 ]
von Wagner, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Canc Res UK Hlth Behav Res Ctr, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp NHS Trust, Bowel Canc Screening Southern Programme Hub, Guildford, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Dept Biochem & Physiol, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
[4] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp NHS Trust, Guildford Undetected Tumour Screening GUTS Char, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
colorectal cancer screening; repeat screening; behavioural markers; reminders; weak positives; abnormal results; colonoscopy attendance; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS; ATTENDANCE;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2014.569
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Most types of population-based cancer screening require repeat participation to be effective. This study investigated predictors of repeat participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Methods: The BCSP in England offers biennial colorectal cancer screening using a guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBt) from age 60-74 years. This analysis included 62 081 individuals aged 60-64 years at the time of the first invitation (R1). The main outcome was repeat participation at their second (R2) or third (R3) invitation. Behavioural measures derived from screening records included late return of the gFOBt kit, compliance with follow-up investigations and previous screening participation. Other potential predictors of repeat participation included results of individual test kit analysis (normal, weak positive, strong positive, spoilt) and the definitive result of the gFOBt screening episode (normal or abnormal). Age, sex and socioeconomic deprivation were also recorded. Results: Overall repeat uptake was 86.6% in R2 and 88.6% in R3. Late return of the test kit was consistently associated with lower uptake (R2: 82.3% vs 88.6%, P<0.001; R3: 84.5% vs 90.5%, P<0.001). A definitive abnormal gFOBt result in the previous screening episode was a negative predictor of repeat uptake (R2: 61.4% vs 86.8%, P<0.001; R3: 65.7% vs 88.8%, P<0.001). Weak positive (R2: 76.9% vs 86.8%, P<0.001; R3: 81.7% vs 88.8%, P<0.05) and spoilt test kits (R2: 79.0% vs 86.6%, NS; R3: 84.2% vs 92.2%, P<0.05) were associated with lower repeat uptake, but were not consistently independent predictors in all invitation rounds or subgroups. Among those with a definitive abnormal gFOBt result, noncompliance with follow-up in a previous screening episode was also associated with lower repeat uptake (R2: 24.3% vs 67.1%, P<0.001; R3: 43.2% vs 69.9%, P<0.001). Conclusions: Behavioural markers and test results from previous screening episodes have been implicated in subsequent gFOBt uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of repeat participation in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme
    S H Lo
    S Halloran
    J Snowball
    H Seaman
    J Wardle
    C von Wagner
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 112 : 199 - 206
  • [2] The NHS bowel cancer screening programme
    Taylor, B. A.
    Ramakrishnan, S.
    Gopal, K.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (03) : 327 - 328
  • [3] NHS BOWEL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME
    Coleman, L.
    Patnick, J.
    Nickerson, C.
    Griffiths, H.
    Fretwell, I.
    [J]. GUT, 2012, 61 : A286 - A286
  • [4] NHS BOWEL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME IN ENGLAND
    Coleman, L.
    Fretwell, I.
    [J]. GUT, 2011, 60 : A250 - A250
  • [5] The NHS Bowel cancer screening programme achieves the anticipated survival improvement, but participation must be improved
    Borowski, David W.
    Cawkwell, Sarah
    Zaidi, Syed M. Amir
    Toward, Matthew
    Maguire, Nicola
    Garg, Dharmendra K.
    Gill, Talvinder S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 31 (02) : 106 - 115
  • [6] Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
    Palmer, C. K.
    Thomas, M. C.
    von Wagner, C.
    Raine, R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 110 (07) : 1705 - 1711
  • [7] Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
    C K Palmer
    M C Thomas
    C von Wagner
    R Raine
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2014, 110 : 1705 - 1711
  • [8] Management of colonic polyps and the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme
    Chattree, A.
    Lee, T. J. W.
    Gupta, S.
    Rutter, M. D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2015, 76 (03) : 132 - 137
  • [9] Comment on ‘Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme: a qualitative study’
    C K Tai
    P Leung
    A Poullis
    G Curry
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 112 : 1834 - 1834
  • [10] Comment on 'Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme: a qualitative study'
    Tai, C. K.
    Leung, P.
    Poullis, A.
    Curry, G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 (11) : 1834 - 1834