RT-PCR negative COVID-19

被引:13
|
作者
Parmar, Heta [1 ,2 ]
Montovano, Margaret [3 ]
Banada, Padmapriya [1 ,2 ]
Pentakota, Sri Ram [1 ,2 ]
Shiau, Stephanie [4 ]
Ma, Zhongjie [4 ]
Saibire, Kaheerman [1 ,2 ]
Chopoorian, Abby [1 ,2 ,3 ]
O'Shaughnessy, Michael [3 ]
Hirsch, Mitchell [3 ]
Jain, Priyanshi [3 ]
Demirdjian, Gaiane [5 ]
Karagueuzian, Magali [5 ]
Robin, Thomas [5 ]
Salvati, Michael [5 ]
Patel, Bhavana [6 ]
Alland, David [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Yingda L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Publ Hlth Res Inst, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Med, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Sch Med, Newark, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Piscataway, NJ USA
[5] Beckman Coulter Inc, Brea, CA USA
[6] Univ Hosp, Newark, NJ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Suspects; RT-PCR; Diagnosis; SARS-COV-2;
D O I
10.1186/s12879-022-07095-x
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background COVID-19 is a multi-system infection with emerging evidence-based antiviral and anti-inflammatory therapies to improve disease prognosis. However, a subset of patients with COVID-19 signs and symptoms have repeatedly negative RT-PCR tests, leading to treatment hesitancy. We used comparative serology early in the COVID-19 pandemic when background seroprevalence was low to estimate the likelihood of COVID-19 infection among RT-PCR negative patients with clinical signs and/or symptoms compatible with COVID-19. Methods Between April and October 2020, we conducted serologic testing of patients with (i) signs and symptoms of COVID-19 who were repeatedly negative by RT-PCR ('Probables'; N = 20), (ii) signs and symptoms of COVID-19 but with a potential alternative diagnosis ('Suspects'; N = 15), (iii) no signs and symptoms of COVID-19 ('Non-suspects'; N = 43), (iv) RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients (N = 40), and (v) pre-pandemic samples (N = 55). Results Probables had similar seropositivity and levels of IgG and IgM antibodies as propensity-score matched RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients (60.0% vs 80.0% for IgG, p-value = 0.13; 50.0% vs 72.5% for IgM, p-value = 0.10), but multi-fold higher seropositivity rates than Suspects and matched Non-suspects (60.0% vs 13.3% and 11.6% for IgG; 50.0% vs 0% and 4.7% for IgM respectively; p-values < 0.01). However, Probables were half as likely to receive COVID-19 treatment than the RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients with similar disease severity. Conclusions Findings from this study indicate a high likelihood of acute COVID-19 among RT-PCR negative with typical signs/symptoms, but a common omission of COVID-19 therapies among these patients. Clinically diagnosed COVID-19, independent of RT-PCR positivity, thus has a potential vital role in guiding treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RT-PCR negative COVID-19
    Heta Parmar
    Margaret Montovano
    Padmapriya Banada
    Sri Ram Pentakota
    Stephanie Shiau
    Zhongjie Ma
    Kaheerman Saibire
    Abby Chopoorian
    Michael O’Shaughnessy
    Mitchell Hirsch
    Priyanshi Jain
    Gaiane Demirdjian
    Magali Karagueuzian
    Thomas Robin
    Michael Salvati
    Bhavana Patel
    David Alland
    Yingda L. Xie
    [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 22
  • [2] Comparison of chest computed tomography findings of RT-PCR negative and RT-PCR positive cases in COVID-19 patients
    Ozkarafakclc, Mufide Arzu
    Ozkurt, Huseyin
    Bardakci, Mustafa Ilteris
    Akilli, Isil Kibar
    Yanc, Ugur
    Altuntas, Yuksel
    Ozdemir, Haci Mustafa
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2022, 82 : 7 - 12
  • [3] Recurrence of COVID-19 Documented with RT-PCR
    Ak, Rohat
    Yilmaz, Erdal
    Seyhan, Avni Uygar
    Doganay, Fatih
    [J]. JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2021, 31 (01): : S26 - S28
  • [4] Role of radiology in RT-PCR negative COVID-19 pneumonia: Review and recommendations
    Sureka, Binit
    Garg, Pawan Kumar
    Saxena, Suvinay
    Garg, Mahendra Kumar
    Misra, Sanjeev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2021, 10 (05) : 1814 - 1817
  • [5] Distinct Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients with Positive or Negative RT-PCR Test
    Saad Menezes, Maria Clara
    Santinelli Pestana, Diego Vinicius
    Ferreira, Juliana Carvalho
    Ribeiro de Carvalho, Carlos Roberto
    Felix, Marcelo Consorti
    Marcilio, Izabel Oliva
    da Silva, Katia Regina
    Cobello Junior, Vilson Cobello
    Marchini, Julio Flavio
    Alencar, Julio Cesar
    Gomez, Luz Marina Gomez
    Maua, Denis Deratani
    Souza, Heraldo Possolo
    [J]. VIRUSES-BASEL, 2022, 14 (02):
  • [6] Diagnosis of COVID-19 by Serology in Admitted Patients with Negative RT-PCR Assay
    Rezaei, Mitra
    Baghaei, Parvaneh
    Sadr, Makan
    Moniri, Afshin
    Babamahmoodi, Abdolreza
    Qadimi, Somayeh
    Porabdollah, Mihan
    Nadji, Seyed Alireza
    Tabarsi, Payam
    Marjani, Majid
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ALLERGY ASTHMA AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 20 (04) : 394 - 401
  • [7] Diagnostic performance of chest CT findings of COVID-19 with RT-PCR negative
    Wakrim, Soukaina
    [J]. AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 22 (04) : 502 - 504
  • [8] Chest CT of COVID-19 in patients with a negative first RT-PCR test Comparison with patients with a positive first RT-PCR test
    Chen, Zu-Hua
    Li, Yun-Jiang
    Wang, Xiu-Juan
    Ye, Yun-Feng
    Wu, Bao-Liang
    Zhang, Yan
    Xuan, Wei-Ling
    Bao, Jian-Feng
    Deng, Xue-Ying
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (26) : E20837
  • [9] Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?
    Waked, R.
    Makhoul, J.
    Saliba, G.
    Chehata, N.
    Mortada, S.
    Zoghbi, A.
    Choucair, J.
    Haddad, E.
    [J]. NEW MICROBES AND NEW INFECTIONS, 2020, 37
  • [10] Patients with Initial Negative RT-PCR and Typical Imaging of COVID-19: Clinical Implications
    Baicry, Florent
    Le Borgne, Pierrick
    Fabacher, Thibaut
    Behr, Martin
    Lemaitre, Elena Laura
    Gayol, Paul-Albert
    Harscoat, Sebastien
    Issur, Nirvan
    Garnier-Kepka, Sabrina
    Ohana, Mickael
    Bilbault, Pascal
    Oberlin, Mathieu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (09) : 1 - 11