Overuse of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance

被引:62
|
作者
Kruse, Gina R. [1 ]
Khan, Sami M. [2 ]
Zaslavsky, Alan M. [3 ]
Ayanian, John Z. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sequist, Thomas D. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Partners Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA USA
关键词
colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy; overuse; efficiency; SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS; NATIONAL-SURVEY; CLINICAL GUIDELINES; POLYP SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS UPDATE; POLYPECTOMY; MEDICARE; RECOMMENDATION; RATIONALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-014-3015-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Ongoing efforts to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have raised concerns that these exams may be overused, thereby subjecting patients to unnecessary risks and wasting healthcare resources. Our aim was to measure overuse of screening and surveillance colonoscopies among average-risk adults, and to identify correlates of overuse. Our approach was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data for patients 50-65 years old with no personal history of CRC or colorectal adenomas with an incident CRC screening colonoscopy from 2001 to 2010 within a multispecialty physician group practice. We measured time to next screening or surveillance colonoscopy and predictors of overuse (exam performed more than one year earlier than guideline recommended intervals) of colonoscopies. We identified 1,429 adults who had an incident colonoscopy between 2001 and 2010, and they underwent an additional 871 screening or surveillance colonoscopies during a median follow-up of 6 years. Most follow-up screening colonoscopies (88 %) and many surveillance colonoscopies (49 %) repeated during the study represented overuse. Time to next colonoscopy after incident screening varied by exam findings (no polyp: median 6.9 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 5.1-10.0; hyperplastic polyp: 5.7 years, IQR: 4.9-9.7; low-risk adenoma: 5.1 years, IQR: 3.3-6.3; high-risk adenoma: 2.9 years, IQR: 2.0-3.4, p < 0.001). In logistic regression models of colonoscopy overuse, an endoscopist recommendation for early follow-up was strongly associated with overuse of screening colonoscopy (OR 6.27, 95 % CI: 3.15-12.50) and surveillance colonoscopy (OR 13.47, 95 % CI 6.61-27.46). In a multilevel logistic regression model, variation in the overuse of screening colonoscopy was significantly associated with the endoscopist performing the previous exam. Overuse of screening and surveillance exams are common and should be monitored by healthcare systems. Variations in endoscopist recommendations represent targets for interventions to reduce overuse.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 283
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Overuse of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
    Gina R. Kruse
    Sami M. Khan
    Alan M. Zaslavsky
    John Z. Ayanian
    Thomas D. Sequist
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 277 - 283
  • [2] Optimizing Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Surveillance
    Erenay, Fatih Safa
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    Said, Adnan
    [J]. M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 16 (03) : 381 - 400
  • [3] Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults
    Jennifer K. Maratt
    Audrey H. Calderwood
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2019, 17 (2) : 292 - 302
  • [5] Colonoscopy overuse in colorectal cancer screening and associated factors in Argentina: a retrospective cohort study
    Santiago Esteban
    Ricardo Ricci
    Sergio Terrasa
    Karin Kopitowski
    [J]. BMC Gastroenterology, 17
  • [6] Colonoscopy overuse in colorectal cancer screening and associated factors in Argentina: a retrospective cohort study
    Esteban, Santiago
    Ricci, Ricardo
    Terrasa, Sergio
    Kopitowski, Karin
    [J]. BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [7] A Bundled Payment Framework for Colonoscopy Performed for Colorectal Cancer Screening or Surveillance
    Brill, Joel V.
    Jain, Rajeev
    Margolis, Peter S.
    Kosinski, Lawrence R.
    Holt, Worthe S., Jr.
    Ketover, Scott R.
    Kim, Lawrence S.
    Clote, Laura E.
    Allen, John I.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (03) : 849 - +
  • [8] Comparison of compliance for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance by colonoscopy based on risk
    Taylor, David P.
    Cannon-Albright, Lisa A.
    Sweeney, Carol
    Williams, Marc S.
    Haug, Peter J.
    Mitchell, Joyce A.
    Burt, Randall W.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (08) : 737 - 743
  • [9] Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in colorectal cancer prevention
    Nicholson, FB
    Korman, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2005, 12 (02) : 89 - 95
  • [10] Impact of Bowel Preparation on Surveillance Colonoscopy Interval for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Singhal, Shashideep
    Mathur, Siddharth
    Basi, Putneet S.
    Kanaparthi, Chethana
    Butt, Amir S.
    Singh, Manpreet
    Momeni, Mojdeh
    Anand, Sury
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB128 - AB128