The influence of question wording on assessments of interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk

被引:6
|
作者
Bottorff, JL
Ratner, PA
Richardson, C
Balneaves, LG
McCullum, M
Hack, T
Chalmers, K
Buxton, J
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Nursing & Hlth Behav Res Unit, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
[3] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[4] Univ Manitoba, Fac Nursing, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pon.699
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the results of different measures of interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk. A telephone survey of a random sample of women without breast cancer was conducted in British Columbia, Canada. Interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk was measured in three ways: (1) an unprompted assessment of interest, (2) assessment of interest when prompted with a hypothetical offer of testing, and (3) assessment of interest when provided with supplementary information. Substantial differences in reported levels of interest in genetic testing were observed across the different assessment approaches, with the unprompted assessment of interest resulting in lowest levels of interest. The highest levels of interest were observed when the assessment of interest was prompted with a hypothetical offer of testing. Factors predicting interest in genetic testing varied depending on the assessment measure used. These findings suggest that more attention must be given to measurement issues, including complete reporting of measures used in research, development of standardized approaches to assessing interest in genetic testing, and more rigorous psychometric evaluations of measures of interest in genetic testing. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 728
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: The influence of sociodemographics and knowledge
    Bottorff, JL
    Ratner, PA
    Balneaves, LG
    Richardson, CG
    McCullum, M
    Hack, T
    Chalmers, K
    Buxton, J
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2002, 11 (01) : 89 - 95
  • [2] Interest in Genetic Testing for Modest Changes in Breast Cancer Risk: Implications for SNP Testing
    Graves, K. D.
    Peshkin, B. N.
    Luta, G.
    Tuong, W.
    Schwartz, M. D.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2011, 14 (03) : 178 - 189
  • [3] Effects of risk counseling on interest in breast cancer genetic testing for lower risk women
    Bowen, DJ
    Burke, W
    Yasui, Y
    McTiernan, A
    McLeran, D
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 4 (05) : 359 - 365
  • [4] Counseling by computer: Breast cancer risk and genetic testing
    Dabney, MK
    Huelsman, K
    [J]. GENETIC TESTING, 2000, 4 (01): : 43 - 44
  • [5] Genetic Risk Assessments in Individuals at High Risk for Inherited Breast Cancer in the Breast Oncology Care Setting
    Pal, Tuya
    Vadaparampil, Susan T.
    [J]. CANCER CONTROL, 2012, 19 (04) : 255 - 266
  • [6] Knowledge, attitudes, and interest in genetic testing among 1,000 women at risk for developing breast cancer
    Kash, KM
    Holland, JC
    Osborne, MP
    Miller, DG
    Rosenthal, G
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1997, 38 (02) : 199 - 200
  • [7] Comparisons of women at various risk levels for breast cancer on knowledge, interest, and decision making about genetic testing
    Kash, KM
    Holland, JC
    Miller, DG
    Osborne, MP
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2000, 41 (02) : 181 - 181
  • [8] Does a Family History of Male Breast Cancer Influence Risk Perception and Use of Genetic Testing?
    Schiffman, Suzanne C.
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2010, 76 (08) : 879 - 882
  • [9] Latina Interest in Genetic Breast Cancer Testing: The Significance of Having a Biological Daughter
    Ramirez, A. G.
    Holden, A. A.
    San Miguel, de Majors S. L.
    Gallion, K. J.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [10] Decisions and outcomes of genetic testing for inherited breast cancer risk
    Halbert, CH
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 : I35 - I39