Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?

被引:44
|
作者
Yan, Bin [1 ]
Zhao, Tingting [2 ]
Liang, Xiufen [1 ]
Niu, Chen [2 ]
Ding, Caixia [3 ]
机构
[1] Shaanxi Prov Tumor Hosp, Dept Radiol, Yan Ta West Rd 309, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shaanxi Prov Tumor Hosp, Dept Pathol, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Endometrial cancer; histological subtype; histological grade; magnetic resonance diffusion; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); TUMOR GRADE; MYOMETRIAL INVASION; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; CERVICAL-CANCER; CARCINOMA; DEPTH; MRI;
D O I
10.1177/0284185117716198
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides useful information for the identification of benign and malignant uterine lesions. However, the use of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for histopathological grading of endometrial cancer is controversial. Purpose: To explore the use of ADC values in differentiating the preoperative tumor grading of endometrioid adenocarcinomas and investigate the relationship between the ADC values of endometrial cancer and the histological tumor subtype. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 98 patients with endometrial cancers, including both endometrioid adenocarcinomas (n = 80) and non-endometrioid adenocarcinomas (n=18). All patients underwent DWI procedures and ADC values were calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the independent samples Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare differences in the ADC values between different tumor grades and different histological subtypes. Results: The mean ADC values (ADCmean) for high-grade endometrioid adenocarcinomas were significantly lower than the values for low-grade tumors (0.800 versus 0.962 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.002). However, no significant differences in ADCmean and minimum ADC values (ADCmin) were found between tumor grades (G1, G2, and G3) of endometrial cancer. Compared with endometrioid adenocarcinomas, the adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation showed lower ADC values (mean/minimum=0.863/0.636 versus 0.962/0.689 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s), but the differences were not significant (P-mean=0.074, P-min=0.441). Moreover, ADCmean for carcinosarcomas was significantly higher than the value for G3 non-carcinosarcoma endometrial cancers (1.047 versus 0.823 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.001). Conclusion: The ADCmean was useful for identifying high-grade and low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Additionally, squamous differentiation may decrease ADCmean and ADCmin of endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and carcinosarcomas showed relatively high ADCmean.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 370
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma
    Ma, Xiaoliang
    Xu, Limin
    Ma, Fenghua
    Zhang, Jialiang
    Zhang, Guofu
    Qiang, Jinwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 164 (03) : 1174 - 1183
  • [2] Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade
    Woo, Sungmin
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (10) : 1270 - 1277
  • [3] Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with tumor cellularity and tumor grade
    Kishimoto, Keiko
    Tajima, Shinya
    Maeda, Ichiro
    Takagi, Masayuki
    Ueno, Takahiko
    Suzuki, Nao
    Nakajima, Yasuo
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (08) : 1021 - 1028
  • [4] The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 3-T MRI differentiates myometrial invasion depth and histological grade in patients with endometrial cancer
    Armando Reyes-Perez, Juan
    Villasenor-Navarro, Yolanda
    Jimenez de los Santos, Mayra Evelia
    Pacheco-Bravo, Irlanda
    Calle-Loja, Maricela
    Sollozo-Dupont, Isabel
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (09) : 1277 - 1286
  • [5] Radiomics analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer: A preliminary study on histological grade evaluation
    Liu, Ying
    Zhang, Yuwei
    Cheng, Runfen
    Liu, Shichang
    Qu, Fangyuan
    Yin, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Qin
    Xiao, Bohan
    Ye, Zhaoxiang
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (01) : 280 - 290
  • [6] Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Nishie, Akihiro
    Tajima, Tsuyoshi
    Asayama, Yoshiki
    Ishigami, Kousei
    Kakihara, Daisuke
    Nakayama, Tomohiro
    Takayama, Yukihisa
    Okamoto, Daisuke
    Fujita, Nobuhiro
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    Yoshimitsu, Kengo
    Honda, Hiroshi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (02) : E29 - E33
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of calculated tumor volumes and apparent diffusion coefficient values in predicting endometrial cancer grade
    Kakkar, Chandan
    Gupta, Kamini
    Jain, Kunal
    Narang, Vikram
    Singh, Aminder
    Saggar, Kavita
    Bansal, Namita
    Cioni, Dania
    Neri, Emanuele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED AND BASIC MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 12 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [8] Is the standard deviation of the apparent diffusion coefficient a potential tool for the preoperative prediction of tumor grade in endometrial cancer?
    Yan, Bin
    Liang, Xiufen
    Zhao, Tingting
    Ding, Caixia
    Zhang, Ming
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (12) : 1724 - 1732
  • [9] Histological Grade of Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer and Relapse Risk Can Be Predicted with Machine Learning from Gene Expression Data
    Gargya, Peter
    Balint, Balint Laszlo
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [10] Apparent diffusion coefficient histograms may predict low-grade glioma subtype
    Tozer, Daniel J.
    Jaeger, H. Rolf
    Danchaivijitr, Nasuda
    Benton, Christopher E.
    Tofts, Paul S.
    Rees, Jeremy H.
    Waldman, Adam D.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2007, 20 (01) : 49 - 57