Midtrimester Ultrasound Predictors of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates

被引:1
|
作者
Patel, Vishal [1 ]
Resnick, Karen [1 ]
Liang, Cynthia [1 ]
Smith, Matthew [2 ]
Haghpeykar, Haleh Sangi [1 ]
Mastrobattista, Joan M. [1 ]
Gandhi, Manisha [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] McGovern Med Sch, Houston, TX USA
关键词
biometric predictors; midtrimester ultrasound; small-for-gestational-age; FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; BIRTH-WEIGHT; IN-UTERO; OUTCOMES; POPULATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/jum.15310
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine whether a specific estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) measurement percentile at the 18-to 24-week ultrasound (US) examination is associated with a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted including women with uncomplicated singleton gestations who delivered a term SGA neonate identified as having a birth weight (BW) below the 10th percentile on the Olsen growth curve and had an 18- to 24-week US examination in our database. The study period was October 2011 to January 2018. A similar number of control charts were requested randomly over the same time with BW in the 10th to 90th percentiles, all which had an 18-to 24-week US examination in our database. After all neonates meeting BW criteria were identified, a chart review was performed to specifically evaluate biometric parameters from the US at 18 to 24 weeks to determine a potential correlation with the EFW percentile and AC percentile. Pregnancy, neonatal outcomes, and maternal demographic characteristics were collected. Results A total of 549 term neonates with a BW below the 10th percentile, and 593 control term neonates with BW in the of 10th to 90th percentiles were reviewed. Our analyses revealed that the AC and EFW percentiles were poor predictors of BW (<10th percentile; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.68 and 0.69, respectively). A similar low ability of AC and EFW to predict BW below the 5th percentile was noted. Conclusions (1) No tipping point or cutoff for the EFW or AC percentile at the 18- to 24-week US examination was identified to predict a term SGA neonate. (2) These data are helpful when counseling women in midgestation about specific parameters, their importance, and the potential need for follow up imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:2027 / 2031
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hypoglycemia in small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Karahasanoglu, O
    Karatekin, G
    Kose, R
    Nuhoglu, A
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1997, 39 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [2] Antenatal Corticosteroids and Outcomes of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates
    Melamed, Nir
    Pittini, Alex
    Barrett, Jon
    Shah, Jyotsna
    Yoon, Eugene W.
    Lemyre, Brigitte
    Lee, Shoo K.
    Murphy, Kellie E.
    Shah, Prakesh S.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (05): : 1001 - 1008
  • [3] Growth trajectory of preterm small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Molony, Claire L.
    Hiscock, Richard
    Kaufman, Jonathan
    Keenan, Emerson
    Hastie, Roxanne
    Brownfoot, Fiona C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 8400 - 8406
  • [4] Cardiac autonomic balance in small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Schaeffer, Leonhard
    Burkhardt, Tilo
    Mueller-Vizentini, Deborah
    Rauh, Manfred
    Tomaske, Maren
    Mieth, Romaine Arlettaz
    Bauersfeld, Urs
    Beinder, Ernst
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 294 (02): : H884 - H890
  • [5] Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Ciobanu, A.
    Khan, N.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 53 (06) : 761 - 768
  • [6] Effectiveness of third trimester ultrasound screening in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: a retrospective cohort study
    Collee, J.
    Noel, L.
    Henry, L.
    Nisolle, M.
    Chantraine, F.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 173 - 174
  • [7] A Systematic Review of Placental Biomarkers Predicting Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates
    Ruchob, Rungnapa
    Rutherford, Julienne N.
    Bell, Aleeca F.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH FOR NURSING, 2018, 20 (03) : 272 - 283
  • [8] Electroencephalographic studies in growth-restricted and small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Nathan J. Stevenson
    Melissa M. Lai
    Hava E. Starkman
    Paul B. Colditz
    Julie A. Wixey
    [J]. Pediatric Research, 2022, 92 : 1527 - 1534
  • [9] Increased cord serum inflammatory markers in small-for-gestational-age neonates
    G Amarilyo
    A Oren
    F B Mimouni
    Y Ochshorn
    V Deutsch
    D Mandel
    [J]. Journal of Perinatology, 2011, 31 : 30 - 32
  • [10] Nomogram of the cerebellar vermis height at birth in small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Zuccotti, Gian Vincenzo
    Pogliani, Laura
    Dilillo, Dario
    Lista, Gianluca
    Radaelli, Giovanni
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2008, 97 (06) : 745 - 750