Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: evaluation of assays for insulin autoantibodies

被引:130
|
作者
Schlosser, M. [2 ,3 ]
Mueller, P. W. [4 ]
Torn, C. [5 ]
Bonifacio, E. [6 ]
Bingley, P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Southmead Hosp, Sch Clin Sci, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Dept Med Biochem & Mol Biol, Res Grp Predict Diagnost, Greifswald, Germany
[3] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Inst Pathophysiol, Res Grp Predict Diagnost, Karlsburg, Germany
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Univ Hosp MAS, Clin Res Ctr, Inst Clin Sci, Unit Diabet & Coeliac Dis, Malmo, Sweden
[6] Tech Univ Dresden, Ctr Regenerat Therapies Dresden, D-8027 Dresden, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Adjusted sensitivity; AUC; Insulin autoantibodies; Insulin autoantibody index; Islet autoantibodies; Prediction; Reference serum; Sensitivity; Specificity; ISLET-CELL ANTIBODIES; MICROASSAY; WORKSHOP;
D O I
10.1007/s00125-010-1915-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims/hypothesis Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) are important in type I diabetes risk assessment. However, their determination varies more between laboratories than other diabetes autoantibodies. The Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program (DASP) aims to improve and standardise measurement of autoantibodies associated with type I diabetes. We report the results of measurement of IAA from DASP workshops in 2002, 2003 and 2005. Methods Up to 32 laboratories in 14 countries participated in each workshop. Aliquots of coded sera from 50 patients with newly diagnosed type I diabetes and 100 blood donor controls were circulated to participating laboratories. Reported results were analysed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. We compared concordance of antibody levels by ranking, IAA and insulin antibody (IA) indices and units derived from an IA standard curve. Results In all three workshops IAA assay performance had improved compared with DASP 2000. The median area under the ROC curve was 0.73 in DASP 2002, 0.78 in 2003 and 0.80 in 2005 (p=0.0012), and median laboratory-assigned sensitivity was 26% in 2002, 36% in 2003 and 45% in 2005 (p<0.0001). There was, however, marked variation between assays. The range of AUC was 0.36-0.91 and that of laboratory-assigned sensitivity was 22-57%. Concordance of ranking of patient serum samples was related to AUC (p<0.001). Using an index related to common IAA and IA-positive or -negative control sera improved the concordance between assays (p<0.0001). Conclusions/interpretation The overall performance of IAA assays has improved but there is still wide variation between laboratories. Concordance between assays would be improved by the use of a common reference reagent.
引用
收藏
页码:2611 / 2620
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: evaluation of assays for insulin autoantibodies
    M. Schlosser
    P. W. Mueller
    C. Törn
    E. Bonifacio
    P. J. Bingley
    [J]. Diabetologia, 2010, 53 : 2611 - 2620
  • [2] Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: First Proficiency Evaluation of Assays for Autoantibodies to Zinc Transporter 8
    Lampasona, Vito
    Schlosser, Michael
    Mueller, Patricia W.
    Williams, Alistair J. K.
    Wenzlau, Janet M.
    Hutton, John C.
    Achenbach, Peter
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 57 (12) : 1693 - 1702
  • [3] Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program:: evaluation of assays for autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and islet antigen-2
    Torn, C.
    Mueller, P. W.
    Schlosser, M.
    Bonifacio, E.
    Bingley, P. J.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2008, 51 (05) : 846 - 852
  • [4] Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: evaluation of assays for autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and islet antigen-2
    C. Törn
    P. W. Mueller
    M. Schlosser
    E. Bonifacio
    P. J. Bingley
    [J]. Diabetologia, 2008, 51 : 846 - 852
  • [5] Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program
    Schlosser, Michael
    Mueller, Patricia W.
    Achenbach, Peter
    Lampasona, Vito
    Bingley, Polly J.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (11) : 2410 - 2412
  • [6] Diabetes antibody standardization program: First assay proficiency evaluation
    Bingley, PJ
    Bonifacio, E
    Mueller, PW
    [J]. DIABETES, 2003, 52 (05) : 1128 - 1136
  • [7] Combined testing of antibody titer and affinity improves insulin autoantibody measurement: Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program
    Achenbach, Peter
    Schlosser, Michael
    Williams, Alistair J. K.
    Yu, Liping
    Mueller, Patricia W.
    Bingley, Polly J.
    Bonifacio, Ezio
    [J]. CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 122 (01) : 85 - 90
  • [8] Standardization and Harmonization of Antiphospholipid Antibody Assays
    Favaloro, Emmanuel J.
    Plebani, Mario
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    [J]. SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2014, 40 (02): : 161 - 162
  • [9] Screening for IgG Antinuclear Autoantibodies by HEp-2 Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assays and the Need for Standardization
    Copple, Susan S.
    Giles, S. Rashelle
    Jaskowski, Troy D.
    Gardiner, Anna E.
    Wilson, Andrew M.
    Hill, Harry R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 137 (05) : 825 - 830
  • [10] THE APOPROTEIN AND ANTIBODY STANDARDIZATION PROGRAM
    ALBERS, JJ
    [J]. ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, 1989, 9 (01): : 144 - 145