Reliable Knowledge A Reply to Turri

Recently John Turri (2015b) has argued, contra the orthodoxy amongst epistemologists, that reliability is not a necessary condition for knowl-edge. From this result, Turri (2015a, 2017, 2016a, 2019) defends a new account of knowledge-called abilism-that allows for unreliable knowledge. I argue that Turri's arguments fail to establish that unreliable knowl-edge is possible and argue that Turri's account of knowledge is false because reliability must be a necessary condition for knowledge.