Comparison of machine learning methods for multiphase flowrate prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang, Zhenyu [1 ]
Wang, Haokun [1 ]
Yang, Yunjie [1 ]
Li, Yi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Agile Tomog Grp, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Tsinghua Shenzhen Int Grad Sch, Div Marine Sci & Technol, Shenzhen, Guandong, Peoples R China
关键词
deep neural network; flowrate; gradient boosting decision tree; machine learning; multiphase flow; support vector machine; GAS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TB8 [摄影技术];
学科分类号
0804 ;
摘要
In this paper, three prevailing machine learning methods, i.e. Deep Neural Network (DNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) models were investigated and compared to estimate the flowrate of oil/gas/water three-phase flow. The time-series differential pressure signals collected from Venturi tube together with pressure and temperature measurements were utilized as input. Multiphase flow experiments were conducted on a laboratory-scale multiphase flow facility. Experimental results suggest that DNN and SVM based methods were able to achieve accurate and reliable estimation of multiphase flowrate, whilst GBDT failed to fit the estimation process well. Another finding emerged from this study is that volumetric gas phase flowrate can also be accurately predicted by implementing SVM model.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning for multiphase flowrate estimation with time series sensing data
    Wang, Haokun
    Zhang, Maomao
    Yang, Yunjie
    [J]. Measurement: Sensors, 2020, 10-12
  • [2] A comparison of machine learning methods for ozone pollution prediction
    Pan, Qilong
    Harrou, Fouzi
    Sun, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [3] A comparison of machine learning methods for ozone pollution prediction
    Qilong Pan
    Fouzi Harrou
    Ying Sun
    [J]. Journal of Big Data, 10
  • [4] A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for the Prediction of Breast Cancer
    Silva, Sara
    Anunciacao, Orlando
    Lotz, Marco
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, MACHINE LEARNING AND DATA MINING IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 6623 : 159 - +
  • [5] A Comparison of Two Modern Machine Learning Methods for Mortality Prediction
    Odden, M.
    Peralta, C.
    Snowden, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 : S99 - S99
  • [6] The Prediction of Diatom Abundance by Comparison of Various Machine Learning Methods
    Shin, Yuna
    Lee, Heesuk
    Lee, Young-Joo
    Seo, Dae Keun
    Jeong, Bomi
    Hong, Seoksu
    Kim, Jaehoon
    Kim, Taekgeun
    Lee, Jae-Kyeong
    Heo, Tae-Young
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [7] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ayana, Omer
    Kanbak, Deniz Furkan
    Keles, Muemine Kaya
    Turhan, Evren
    [J]. ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2023, 71 (06) : 2905 - 2922
  • [8] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ömer Ayana
    Deniz Furkan Kanbak
    Mümine Kaya Keleş
    Evren Turhan
    [J]. Acta Geophysica, 2023, 71 : 2905 - 2922
  • [9] The performance comparison of machine learning methods for solar PV power prediction
    Demir, Funda
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [10] A comparison of two machine learning methods for protein secondary structure prediction
    Wang, LH
    Liu, J
    Zhou, HB
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 2730 - 2735