Using a Distributed Hydrologic Model to Improve the Green Infrastructure Parameterization Used in a Lumped Model

被引:15
|
作者
Fry, Timothy J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maxwell, Reed M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, ReNUWIt Engn Res Ctr, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Geol & Geol Engn, Hydrol Sci & Engn Program, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[3] Enginu Engn Solut, 10106 W San Juan Way,Suite 215, Littleton, CO 80127 USA
来源
WATER | 2018年 / 10卷 / 12期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
green infrastructure; stormwater runoff; runoff volume; peak flow; water quantity; urban stormwater; hydrology; modeling; DIAGNOSE INTEGRATED HYDROLOGY; INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT; WATERSHED-SCALE; SURFACE; RUNOFF; SCHEMES; IMPACT; FLOW; SOIL; IMPERVIOUSNESS;
D O I
10.3390/w10121756
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stormwater represents a complex and dynamic component of the urban water cycle. Hydrologic models have been used to study pre- and post-development hydrology, including green infrastructure. However, many of these models are applied in urban environments with very little formal verification and/or benchmarking. Here we present the results of an intercomparison study between a distributed model (Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis, GSSHA) and a lumped parameter model (the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Storm Water Management Model, EPA-SWMM) for an urban system. The distributed model scales to higher resolutions, allows for rainfall to be spatially and temporally variable, and solves the shallow water equations. The lumped model uses a non-linear reservoir method to determine runoff rates and volumes. Each model accounts for infiltration, initial abstraction losses, but solves the watershed flow equations in a different way. We use an urban case study with representation of green infrastructure to test the behavior of both models. Results from this case study show that when calibrated, the lumped model is able to represent green infrastructure for small storm events at lower implementation levels. However, as both storm intensity and amount of green infrastructure implementation increase, the lumped model diverges from the distributed model, overpredicting the benefits of green infrastructure on the system. We performed benchmark test cases to evaluate and understand key processes within each model. The results show similarities between the models for the standard cases for simple infiltration. However, as the domain increased in complexity the lumped model diverged from the distributed model. This indicates differences in how the models represent the physical processes and numerical solution approaches used between each. When the distributed model results were used to modify the representation of impermeable surface connections within the lumped model, the results were improved. These results demonstrate how complex, distributed models can be used to improve the formulation of lumped models.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implications of distributed hydrologic model parameterization on water fluxes at multiple scales and locations
    Kumar, Rohini
    Samaniego, Luis
    Attinger, Sabine
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (01) : 360 - 379
  • [2] Hydrologic simulation with a distributed hydrologic model
    Chen, Xing
    Yu, Zhongbo
    Cui, Guangbai
    [J]. ICNC 2008: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION, VOL 5, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 539 - 543
  • [3] Estimating the Potential Benefits of Green Stormwater Infrastructure on Developed Sites Using Hydrologic Model Simulation
    Dietrich, Anthony
    Yarlagadda, Rahul
    Gruden, Cyndee
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2017, 36 (02) : 557 - 564
  • [4] Intercomparison of lumped versus distributed hydrologic model ensemble simulations on operational forecast scales
    Carpenter, Theresa M.
    Georgakakos, Konstantine P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 329 (1-2) : 174 - 185
  • [5] Evaluation of climate anomalies impacts on the Upper Blue Nile Basin in Ethiopia using a distributed and a lumped hydrologic model
    Elsanabary, Mohamed Helmy
    Gan, Thian Yew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 530 : 225 - 240
  • [6] Using digital terrain analysis modeling techniques for the parameterization of a hydrologic model
    Lacroix, MP
    Martz, LW
    Kite, GW
    Garbrecht, J
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2002, 17 (02) : 127 - 136
  • [7] Parallelisation of a distributed hydrologic model
    Cui, Zhengtao
    Vieux, Baxter
    Neeman, Henry
    Moreda, Fekadu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 22 (01) : 42 - 52
  • [8] Estimating basin evapotranspiration using distributed hydrologic model
    Xu, ZX
    Li, JY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2003, 8 (02) : 74 - 80
  • [9] Integrating Qualitative Flow Observations in a Lumped Hydrologic Routing Model
    Mazzoleni, M.
    Amaranto, A.
    Solomatine, D. P.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (07) : 6088 - 6108
  • [10] Transferability of a lumped hydrologic model, the Xin'anjiang model based on similarity in climate and geography
    Liu, Yue
    Zhang, Jian-yun
    Guan, Xiao-xiang
    Wang, Guo-qing
    Liu, Yue
    Zhang, Jian-yun
    Guan, Xiao-xiang
    Liu, Cui-shan
    He, Rui-min
    Wang, Guo-qing
    Zhang, Jian-yun
    Liu, Cui-shan
    He, Rui-min
    Wang, Guo-qing
    Elmahdi, Amgad
    Yang, Qin-Li
    [J]. WATER SUPPLY, 2021, 21 (05) : 2191 - 2201