Trainee Performance After Laparoscopic Simulator Training Using a Blackbox versus LapMentor

被引:11
|
作者
Oussi, Ninos [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Enochsson, Lars [3 ,4 ]
Henningsohn, Lars [3 ,5 ]
Castegren, Markus [1 ,6 ]
Georgiou, Evangelos [7 ,8 ]
Kjellin, Ann [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Div Surg, CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Clin Res Sormland, Eskilstuna, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Ctr Adv Med Simulat & Training, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Div Surg, Umea, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Div Urol, CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Perioperat Med & Intens Care PMI, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Univ Athens, Med Phys Lab, Athens, Greece
[8] Univ Athens, Simulat Ctr, Med Sch, Athens, Greece
关键词
Educational study; Simulation technology; Basic skills training; Blackbox; Haptic feedback; VIRTUAL-REALITY TRAINER; SURGICAL SKILLS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; HAPTIC FEEDBACK; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR-SKILLS; SURGERY; CURRICULUM; EXPERIENCE; RESIDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.039
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Training using laparoscopic high-fidelity simulators (LHFSs) to proficiency levels improves laparoscopic cholecystectomy skills. However, high-cost simulators and their limited availability could negatively impact residents' laparoscopic training opportunities. Weaimed to assess whether motivation and surgical skill performance differ after basic skills training (BST) using a low-cost (Blackbox) versus LHFS (LapMentor) among medical students. Materials and methods: Sixty-three medical students from Karolinska Institutet volunteered, completing written informed consent, questionnaire regarding expectations of the simulation training, and a visuospatial ability test. They were randomized into two groups that received BST using Blackbox (n = 32) or LapMentor (n = 31). However, seven students absence resulted in 56 participants, followed by another 9 dropouts. Subsequently, after training, 47 students took up three consecutive tests using the minimally invasive surgical trainerevirtual reality (MIST-VR) simulator, finalizing a questionnaire. Results: More Blackbox group participants completed all MIST-VR tests (29/31 versus 18/25). Students anticipated mastering LapMentor would be more difficult than Blackbox (P = 0.04). In those completing the simulation training, a trend toward an increase was noted in how well participants in the Blackbox group liked the simulator training (P = 0.07). Subgroup analysis of motivation and difficulty in liking the training regardless of simulator was found only in women (Blackbox [P = 0.02]; LapMentor [P = 0.06]). In the Blackbox group, the perceived difficulty of training, facilitation, and liking the Blackbox training (significant only in women) were significantly correlated with the students' performance in the MIST-simulator. No such correlations were found in the LapMentor group. Conclusions: Results indicate an important role for low-tech/low-cost Blackbox laparoscopic BST of students in an otherwise high-tech surrounding. Furthermore, experience of Blackbox BST procedures correlate with students' performance in the MIST-VR simulator, with some gender-specific differences. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Role of Haptic Feedback in Laparoscopic Training Using the LapMentor II
    Salkini, Mohamad W.
    Doarn, Charles R.
    Kiehl, Nicholai
    Broderick, Timothy J.
    Donovan, James F.
    Gaitonde, Krishnanath
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) : 99 - 102
  • [2] Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator: Training tool for surgical trainee in Malaysia
    Khoo, Hau Chun
    Chik, Ian
    Azman, Azlanudin
    Zuhdi, Zamri
    Harunarashid, Hanafiah
    Jarmin, Razman
    [J]. FORMOSAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 54 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [3] Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the OR
    Korndorffer, JR
    Seirra, R
    Dunne, JB
    Scott, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (03) : S73 - S74
  • [4] Can interview prior to laparoscopic simulator training predict a trainee's skills?
    Nomura, Tsutomu
    Miyashita, Masao
    Shrestha, Suman
    Makino, Hiroshi
    Nakamura, Yoshihoru
    Aso, Ryouko
    Yoshimura, Akinobu
    Shimuro, Toshiro
    Akira, Shigeo
    Tajiri, Takashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 65 (05) : 335 - 339
  • [5] Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room
    Korndorffer, JR
    Dunne, JB
    Sierra, R
    Stefanidis, D
    Touchard, CL
    Scott, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2005, 201 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [6] Correlation of surgical trainee performance on laparoscopic versus endoscopic simulation
    Koichopolos, Jennifer
    Hawel, Jeffrey
    Shlomovitz, Eran
    Habaz, Ilay
    Elnahas, Ahmad
    Alkhamesi, Nawar A.
    Schlachta, Christopher M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (05): : 2007 - 2011
  • [7] Correlation of surgical trainee performance on laparoscopic versus endoscopic simulation
    Jennifer Koichopolos
    Jeffrey Hawel
    Eran Shlomovitz
    Ilay Habaz
    Ahmad Elnahas
    Nawar A. Alkhamesi
    Christopher M. Schlachta
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 2007 - 2011
  • [8] Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
    Bas Kengen
    Wouter M. IJgosse
    Harry van Goor
    Jan-Maarten Luursema
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 21
  • [9] Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance
    Kengen, Bas
    IJgosse, Wouter M.
    van Goor, Harry
    Luursema, Jan-Maarten
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [10] Significant increase in trainee credibility score after mechanical ERCP simulator training
    Leung, Joseph
    Leung, Felix
    Lee, Wen
    Rojany, Micha
    Wilson, Robert
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (09): : S108 - S109