The different responses of universities to introduction of performance-based research funding

被引:11
|
作者
Abramo, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Syst Anal & Comp Sci IASI CNR, Lab Studies Res Evaluat, Via Taurini 19, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] CNR, Ist Anal Sistemi & Informat, Via Taurini 19, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Lab Studies Res Evaluat, IASI CNR, Via Politecn 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento Ingn Impresa, Via Politecn 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy
关键词
scientometrics; research policy; R&D management; research evaluation; Italy; RANKINGS; SIZE; PUBLICATIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; INCENTIVES; CITATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1093/reseval/rvab022
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Governments and organizations design performance-based research funding systems (PBRFS) for strategic aims, such as to selectively allocate scarce resources and stimulate research efficiency. In this work, we analyze the relative change in research productivity of Italian universities after the introduction of such a system, featuring financial and reputational incentives. Using a bibliometric approach, we compare the relative research performance of universities before and after the introduction of PBRFS, at the overall, discipline and field levels. The findings show convergence in the universities' performance, due above all to the remarkable improvement of the lowest performers. Geographically, the universities of the south (vs central and northern Italy) achieved the greatest improvement in relative performance. The methodology, and results, should be of use to university management and policy-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 528
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条