Physiological responses of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-sensitive soybean to aminomethylphosphonic acid, a metabolite of glyphosate

被引:42
|
作者
Ding, Wei [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Reddy, Krishna N. [1 ]
Zablotowicz, Robert M. [1 ]
Bellaloui, Nacer [2 ]
Bruns, H. Arnold [1 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Crop Prod Syst Res Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
[2] ARS, USDA, Crop Genet Res Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
[3] NE Agr Univ, Agron Coll, Dept Plant Protect, Harbin 150030, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Minist Educ, Key Lab Soybean Biol, Harbin 150030, Peoples R China
关键词
Aminomethylphosphonic acid; AMPA; Glyphosate; Soybean injury; Photosynthesis; Nitrogen fixation; NITROGENASE ACTIVITY; SHIKIMIC ACID; ACCUMULATION; MINERALIZATION; HERBICIDE; FIXATION; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) is formed in glyphosate-treated glyphosate-resistant (GR) and glyphosate-sensitive (GS) soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plants and is known to cause yellowing in soybean. Although, AMPA is less phytotoxic than glyphosate, its mode of action is different from that of glyphosate and is still unknown. Greenhouse studies were conducted at Stoneville, MS to determine the effects of AMPA on plant growth, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, nodulation, nitrogenase activity, nitrate reductase activity, and shoot nitrogen content in GR and GS soybeans. AMPA was applied to one- to two-trifoliolate leaf stage soybeans at 0.1 and 1.0 kg ha(-1), representing a scenario of 10% and 100% degradation of glyphosate (1.0 kg ae ha(-1) use rate) to AMPA, respectively. Overall, AMPA effects were more pronounced at 1.0 kg ha(-1) than at 0.1 kg ha(-1) rate. Visual plant injury (18-27%) was observed on young leaves within 3 d after treatment (DAT) with AMPA at the higher rate regardless of soybean type. AMPA injury peaked to 46-49% at 14 DAT and decreased to 17-18% by 28 DAT, in both soybean types. AMPA reduced the chlorophyll content by 37%, 48%, 66%, and 23% in GR soybean, and 17%, 48%, 57%, and 22% in GS soybean at 3, 7, 14, and 28 DAT, respectively. AMPA reduced the photosynthesis rate by 65%, 85%, and 77% in GR soybean and 59%, 88%, and 69% in GS soybean at 3, 7, and 14 DAT, respectively, compared to non-treated plants. Similarly, AMPA reduced stomatal conductance to water vapor and transpiration rates at 3, 7, and 14 DAT compared to non-treated plants in both soybean types. Photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate recovered to the levels of non-treated plants by 28 DAT. Plant height and shoot dry weight at 28 DAT; nodulation, nitrogenase activity at 10 DAT, and nitrate reductase activity at 3 and 14 DAT were unaffected by AMPA. AMPA reduced root respiration and shoot nitrogen content at 10 DAT. These results suggest that a foliar application of AMPA could indirectly reduce photosynthesis through decreased chlorophyll content in GR and GS soybean up to 14 DAT, but affected plants can recover to normal growth by 28 DAT. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 598
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aminomethylphosphonic acid, a metabolite of glyphosate, causes injury in glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Reddy, KN
    Rimando, AM
    Duke, SO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2004, 52 (16) : 5139 - 5143
  • [2] Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid detected in glyphosate-resistant soybean seeds.
    Rimando, AM
    Reddy, KN
    Smeda, RJ
    Pace, PF
    Duke, SO
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 224 : U78 - U78
  • [3] Isoflavone, glyphosate, and aminomethylphosphonic acid levels in seeds of glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Duke, SO
    Rimando, AM
    Pace, PF
    Reddy, KN
    Smeda, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2003, 51 (01) : 340 - 344
  • [4] Differentiating Glyphosate-Resistant and Glyphosate-Sensitive Italian Ryegrass using Hyperspectral Imagery
    Lee, Matthew A.
    Huang, Yanbo
    Nandula, Vijay K.
    Reddy, Krishna N.
    [J]. SENSING FOR AGRICULTURE AND FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY VI, 2014, 9108
  • [5] Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Interference in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean
    Lee, Donna
    Miller, Donnie
    Blouin, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2009, 13 (02): : 174 - 177
  • [6] Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate
    Elmore, RW
    Roeth, FW
    Klein, RN
    Knezevic, SZ
    Martin, A
    Nelson, LA
    Shapiro, CA
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (02) : 404 - 407
  • [7] Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant cotton in glyphosate-resistant soybean
    York, AC
    Stewart, AM
    Vidrine, PR
    Culpepper, AS
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) : 532 - 539
  • [8] Glyphosate-Resistant and Conventional Canola (Brassica napus L.) Responses to Glyphosate and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid (AMPA) Treatment
    Correa, Elza Alves
    Dayan, Franck E.
    Owens, Daniel K.
    Rimando, Agnes M.
    Duke, Stephen O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2016, 64 (18) : 3508 - 3513
  • [9] Evolution of glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Vila-Aiub, Martin M.
    Balbi, Maria C.
    Gundel, Pedro E.
    Ghersa, Claudio M.
    Powles, Stephen B.
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2007, 55 (06) : 566 - 571
  • [10] Glyphosate-resistant soybean response to various salts of glyphosate and glyphosate accumulation in soybean nodules
    Reddy, KN
    Zablotowicz, RM
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2003, 51 (04) : 496 - 502