共 50 条
Accuracy of Fibroscan, Compared With Histology, in Analysis of Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Hepatitis B or C: A United States Multicenter Study
被引:142
|作者:
Afdhal, Nezam H.
[1
,2
]
Bacon, Bruce R.
[3
]
Patel, Keyur
[4
]
Lawitz, Eric J.
[5
]
Gordon, Stuart C.
[6
]
Nelson, David R.
[7
]
Challies, Tracy L.
[1
,2
]
Nasser, Imad
[1
,2
]
Garg, Jyotsna
[4
]
Wei, Lee-Jen
[8
]
McHutchison, John G.
[4
]
机构:
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Liver, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Texas Liver Inst, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[6] Henry Ford Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[7] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Gainesville, FL USA
[8] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词:
Liver Disease;
HBV;
HCV;
Diagnosis;
Diagnostic;
TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY;
STIFFNESS MEASUREMENT;
NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT;
SERUM MARKERS;
PERFORMANCE;
DIAGNOSIS;
CIRRHOSIS;
FIBROTEST;
DISEASE;
COHORT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cgh.2014.12.014
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver biopsy is invasive and associated with complications, sampling errors, and observer variability. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) with FibroScan can be used to immediately assess liver stiffness. We aimed to define optimal levels of liver stiffness to identify patients with chronic viral hepatitis and significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, or cirrhosis. METHODS: In a prospective, 2-phase study, patients with chronic hepatitis C or B underwent VCTE followed by liver biopsy analysis from January 2005 through May 2008 at 6 centers in the United States. In phase 1 we identified optimal levels of liver stiffness for identification of patients with stage F2-F4 or F4 fibrosis (the development phase, n = 188). In phase 2 we tested these cutoff values in a separate cohort of patients (the validation phase, n = 560). All biopsies were assessed for METAVIR stage by a single pathologist in the phase 1 analysis and by a different pathologist in the phase 2 analysis. Diagnostic performances of VCTE were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses. RESULTS: In phase 1 of the study, liver stiffness measurements identified patients with >= F2 fibrosis with AUROC value of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.92) and identified patients with F4 fibrosis with AUROC value of 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.95). Liver stiffness cutoff values (kPa) in phase 1 were 8.4 for >= F2 (82% sensitivity, 79% specificity) and 12.8 for F4 (84% sensitivity, 86% specificity). In the phase 2 analysis, the liver stiffness cutoff values identified patients with >= F2 fibrosis with 58% sensitivity (P < .0001 vs phase 1) and 75% specificity (nonsignificant difference vs phase 1); they identified patients with F4 fibrosis with 76% sensitivity (P < .0001 vs phase 1) and 85% specificity (nonsignificant differences vs phase 1). VCTE had an interobserver agreement correlation coefficient of 0.98 (n = 26) and an intra-observer agreement correlation coefficient of 0.95 (n = 34). CONCLUSIONS: In a large U. S. multicenter study, we confirmed that VCTE provides an accurate assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Our findings are similar to those from European and Asian cohorts.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / +
页数:11
相关论文