Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in early glottic cancer T1-2N0M0: A randomized study

Objective: Glottic cancer has an excellent probability of cure. The early glottic cancer is usually treated by radiotherapy with different fractionation schedules. The aim of this study was to compare conventional versus hypofractionated radiotherapy with respect to overall survival and disease-free survival. Materials and Methods: A total of fifty patients with T1-2N0M0 glottic cancer with no previous treatment history were prospectively randomized into two arms. In Arm A (Study), patients received a total of 55 Gy in 20# at 2.75 Gy/#, 5 days a week. In Arm B (Control), patients received a total of 66 Gy in 33# at 2 Gy/#, 5 days a week. Disease response was evaluated by the WHO criteria at the end of treatment, then at 1, 2, and 3 months to complete their 6-month follow-up. Overall survival and disease-free survival were evaluated at 1, 2, and 3 years. Results: Overall, 100% of patients in the study arm and 96% of patients in the control arm had complete response after 6 months. Overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 96%, 96%, and 88%, respectively, in the study arm, while in the control arm, these values were 92%, 84%, and 80%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Disease-free survival at 3 years was 88% in the study arm and 80% in the control arm. Conclusion: The study suggests that hypofractionated regimen may be better in local control and symptomatic relief with the added advantage of shorter treatment time, which offers better patient compliance and advantageous in busy setups where there is heavy patient load.