Energy management using multi-criteria decision making and machine learning classification algorithms for intelligent system

被引:25
|
作者
Musbah, Hmeda [1 ]
Ali, Gama [1 ]
Aly, Hamed H. [1 ]
Little, Timothy A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Hybrid energy systems; Topsis; Scheduling and managing; Demand side confusion; Matrix; POWER-GENERATION; FUZZY TOPSIS; SELECTION; MODEL; PREDICTION; STRATEGY; PROJECT; MCDM;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107645
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Hybrid energy systems (HESs) are one of the most effective solutions for the power demand especially in remote areas. It is well-known that the HESs usually include renewables like solar and/or wind energy sources. Renewables are intermittent, fluctuating, and nonlinear. Therefore, an effective energy management plays an essential role in organizing the power flow in hybrid energy sources. In this work, a hybrid energy system (HES) composed of wind, gasoline and diesel generator is used as a case study to electrify a specific remote area. The sources of the HES are categorized in different arrangements to select the best combination from all available six energy sources combinations based on five criteria using the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). This work is divided into two stages, in the first stage; a historical demand side dataset is used to model and calculate the five criteria. TOPSIS method results are combined with the five criteria and the demand side to form a dataset. In the second stage, machine learning algorithms, namely random forest (RF) and light gradient boosted machine (LightGBM) algorithms are used to predict the combination of the energy sources as a way of validating the proposed work. Evaluating the algorithms shows the superiority of RF algorithm with accuracy of 81.81% over LightGBM with accuracy of 68.6%. The behavior of both algorithms is explained using the confusion matrix. RF algorithm classifies the classes G1G2, and G2 correctly and misclassifies some values of the other classes. On the other hand, LightGBM algorithm classifies the class G2 correctly and misclassifies some values of the other classes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Selection of Hybrid Renewable Energy System Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Algorithms
    Rezk, Hegazy
    Mukhametzyanov, Irik Z.
    Al-Dhaifallah, Mujahed
    Ziedan, Hamdy A.
    [J]. CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 68 (02): : 2001 - 2027
  • [2] FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING ALGORITHMS
    Peneva, Vania
    Popchev, Ivan
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2010, 63 (07): : 979 - 992
  • [3] An integrated decision analytic framework of machine learning with multi-criteria decision making for multi-attribute inventory classification
    Kartal, Hasan
    Oztekin, Asil
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    Cebi, Ferhan
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 101 : 599 - 613
  • [4] Predicting Diabetes Mellitus With Machine Learning Techniques Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Juneja, Abhinav
    Juneja, Sapna
    Kaur, Sehajpreet
    Kumar, Vivek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (02) : 38 - 52
  • [5] A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Procedure for the Analysis of an Energy System
    Ming-Shan Zhu Bu-Xuan Wang Yun-Han Xiao Department of Thermal Engineering
    [J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 1992, (04) : 221 - 225
  • [6] Assessing the performance of residential energy management control Algorithms: Multi-criteria decision making using the analytical hierarchy process
    Omar, Farhad
    Bushby, Steven T.
    Williams, Ronald D.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 199 : 537 - 546
  • [7] A multi-criteria decision model to support sustainable building energy management system with intelligent automation
    Uzair, Muhammad
    Kazmi, Syed Ali Abbas
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 301
  • [8] Recommendation of Machine Learning Techniques for Software Effort Estimation using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Kumar, Ajay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 30 (02) : 221 - 241
  • [9] Evaluation of machine learning techniques for heart disease prediction using multi-criteria decision making
    Kumar, Ajay
    Singh, Anuj Kumar
    Garg, Ankit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2024, 46 (01) : 1259 - 1273
  • [10] Accurate multi-criteria decision making methodology for recommending machine learning algorithm
    Ali, Rahman
    Lee, Sungyoung
    Chung, Tae Choong
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 71 : 257 - 278