A Comparison of Co-current and Counter-current Modes of Operation in Urea Prilling Tower

被引:0
|
作者
Rahamnian, Nejat [1 ,2 ]
Homayoonfard, Marjan
机构
[1] Univ Bradford, Sch Engn & Informat, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Chem Engn, Tronoh 31750, Perak, Malaysia
关键词
urea; prilling; counter-current; co-current; spray cooling; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.917.199
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, a model for urea prilling tower with co-current flow of cooling air and urea prills (particles) is presented. The process is modelled by simultaneous solution of the differential equations for hydrodynamics, heat and mass transfer between the air and prills. The process variables such as temperature, absolute and relative humidity of air along the height of the tower were obtained from this model. Temperature and moisture distribution of urea prills and their radial and vertical velocities were also calculated. The results of the present model were compared with the counter-current operation model available in the literature. The simulation results show that heat transfer performance for co-current operation is significantly less than that of the counter-current scenario. This is more pronounced for small prills, i.e. 1.0 mm than that of the large prills. The advantage of the model is that it can be used to investigate influence of operating parameters on efficiency of the co-current process. This also helps us to set the process control strategies for design and quality control purposes of the process.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of co-current and counter-current modes of operation for a dual-type industrial methanol reactor
    Rahimpour, M. R.
    Lotfinejad, A.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2008, 47 (9-10) : 1819 - 1830
  • [2] Co-current and counter-current modes for water gas shift membrane reactor
    Basile, A
    Paturzo, L
    Gallucci, F
    [J]. CATALYSIS TODAY, 2003, 82 (1-4) : 275 - 281
  • [3] Co-current and counter-current modes for methanol steam reforming membrane reactor
    Gallucci, Fausto
    Basile, Angelo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2006, 31 (15) : 2243 - 2249
  • [4] Co-current and counter-current fixed bed combustion of biofuel - a comparison
    Thunman, H
    Leckner, B
    [J]. FUEL, 2003, 82 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [5] HEATING OF POWDERS IN COUNTER-CURRENT AND CO-CURRENT INDUCTION PLASMAS
    WALDIE, B
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS AND THE CHEMICAL ENGINEER, 1971, 49 (02): : 114 - &
  • [6] Co-current and counter-current modes for methanol steam reforming membrane reactor: Experimental study
    Basile, A.
    Tosti, S.
    Capannelli, G.
    Vitulli, G.
    Iulianelli, A.
    Gallucci, F.
    Drioli, E.
    [J]. CATALYSIS TODAY, 2006, 118 (1-2) : 237 - 245
  • [7] A comparison of co-current and counter-current modes of operation for a novel hydrogen-permselective membrane dual-type FTS reactor in GTL technology
    Rahimpour, M. R.
    Forghani, A. A.
    Mostafazadeh, A. Khosravanipour
    Shariati, A.
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 91 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [8] Co-current drying plus counter-current cooling in a rotary drum
    Trojosky, M.
    Stölzner, G.
    Fill, C.
    [J]. Cement International, 2019, 17 (04): : 54 - 61
  • [9] On the conditional superiority of counter-current over co-current extraction in microchannels
    J. R. Picardo
    S. Pushpavanam
    [J]. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2013, 15 : 701 - 713
  • [10] Semiglobal Exponential Stability of a Counter-Current and Co-Current Guidance Scheme
    Caharija, Walter
    Grotli, Esten I.
    Pettersen, Kristin Y.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (29): : 274 - 280