Microbial cross-feeding promotes multiple stable states and species coexistence, but also susceptibility to cheaters

被引:22
|
作者
Sun, Zepeng [1 ]
Koffel, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Stump, Simon M. [1 ]
Grimaud, Ghjuvan M. [1 ]
Klausmeier, Christopher A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, WK Kellogg Biol Stn, Hickory Corners, MI 49060 USA
[2] UMR Eco & Sols, Campus Supagro,2 Pl Viala, F-34060 Montpellier, France
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Biol, Dept Integrat Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Program Ecol Evolutionary Biol & Behav, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Mutualism; Cheater; Resource competition; Invasion; RESOURCE COMPETITION; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; COOPERATION; EVOLUTION; MUTUALISTS; STABILITY; TESTS; DEGRADATION; PERSISTENCE; CONSORTIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.01.009
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mutualism, interspecific cooperation that yields reciprocal benefits, can promote species coexistence, enhancing biodiversity. As a specific form of mutualism, cross-feeding, where each of two mutualists produces a resource the other one needs, has been broadly studied. However, few theoretical studies have examined competition between cross-feeding mutualists and cheaters, who do not synthesize resources themselves. In this paper we study a model with two mutualists, a cheater, two micronutrients that are synthesized and exchanged by the mutualists, and one macronutrient that is only from external supply. We investigate the coexistence of the species in the framework of resource competition theory. In particular, we examine the effect of the mutualists' synthesis rates on their coexistence. In the absence of cheaters, multiple stable states occur if the synthesis rates are high, and higher synthesis rates increase the possibility that mutualists coexist. However, when the cheater is present, higher synthesis rates promote invasion by the cheater: If the cheater is superior on all three resources, it will either persist with at most one mutualist or even trigger extinction of all three species; if the cheater is only superior on the macronutrient, both mutualists may still coexist with the cheater. Our results provide a framework for further study on more complex mutualistic networks and real microbial communities. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 77
页数:15
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Two types of coexistence in cross-feeding microbial consortia
    Nakaoka, Shinji
    Takeuchi, Yasuhiro
    COLLECTIVE DYNAMICS: TOPICS ON COMPETITION AND COOPERATION IN THE BIOSCIENCES, 2008, 1028 : 233 - +
  • [2] Modeling microbial cross-feeding at intermediate scale portrays community dynamics and species coexistence
    Liao, Chen
    Wang, Tong
    Maslov, Sergei
    Xavier, Joao B.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 16 (08)
  • [3] Local interactions and self-organized spatial patterns stabilize microbial cross-feeding against cheaters
    Stump, Simon Maccracken
    Johnson, Evan Curtis
    Klausmeier, Christopher A.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2018, 15 (140)
  • [4] Flow-through stable isotope probing (Flow-SIP) minimizes cross-feeding in complex microbial communities
    Maria Mooshammer
    Katharina Kitzinger
    Arno Schintlmeister
    Soeren Ahmerkamp
    Jeppe Lund Nielsen
    Per Halkjær Nielsen
    Michael Wagner
    The ISME Journal, 2021, 15 : 348 - 353
  • [5] Flow-through stable isotope probing (Flow-SIP) minimizes cross-feeding in complex microbial communities
    Mooshammer, Maria
    Kitzinger, Katharina
    Schintlmeister, Arno
    Ahmerkamp, Soeren
    Nielsen, Jeppe Lund
    Nielsen, Per Halkjaer
    Wagner, Michael
    ISME JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (01): : 348 - 353
  • [6] Targeted prebiotic application of gluconic acid-containing oligosaccharides promotes Faecalibacterium growth through microbial cross-feeding networks
    Negishi, Hiroki
    Ichikawa, Ayumi
    Takahashi, Saori
    Kano, Hiroshi
    Makino, Seiya
    ISME JOURNAL, 2025, 19 (01):