Occupational health, safety and work environments in Norwegian fish farming-employee perspective

被引:19
|
作者
Thorvaldsen, Trine [1 ]
Kongsvik, Trond [2 ]
Holmen, Ingunn Marie [1 ]
Storkersen, Kristine [3 ]
Salomonsen, Cecilie [1 ]
Sandsund, Mariann [4 ]
Bjelland, Hans, V [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Ocean, POB 4760, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Econ & Technol Management, NTNU, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[3] NTNU Social Res, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[4] SINTEF Digital, Dept Hlth Res, POB 4760, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
AQUACULTURE; INJURIES; DISEASES; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735238
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Background: Aquaculture workers are exposed to several workplace hazards. Norwegian fish farming has a high occupational injury rate. This article provides new knowledge about workers' perceptions of their health and work environment. Methods: The study is based on data collected in a telephone survey with 447 participants and 35 qualitative interviews. The survey respondents were mainly personnel working at fish farms and on service vessels. The interviewees included personnel at fish farms as well as managers and staff. Data were analysed according to a model that included working conditions and exposures, health complaints and concerns, sickness absence, subjective health status and job satisfaction. Results: The survey data show that physical and ergonomic exposures are the most common, and several workers report psychosocial exposures such as stress and lack of control in their workday. The most frequently reported health complaints were musculoskeletal (neck/shoulder/arm pain, back pain, hand/wrist pain, knee/hip pain). More than half of the respondents have concerns that their work environment may affect their health negatively. Work-related sickness absences related to strain and acute injuries are reported by 11.6% of respondents. Eighty- five per cent consider their health as good or very good, and 97% are satisfied at work always or most of the time. Interview data identify several work tasks that were perceived as particularly straining but also confirm the high level of job satisfaction in the industry. Discussion: Hazards in the work environment need to be removed or mitigated to prevent unfavourable health exposures. Conflicting objectives in the production process may lead to work pressure for workers. Organisational factors that could improve individual work conditions are avoidance of long working hours and ensuring adequate rest between shifts. Workplace risk levels may be influenced by the design of fish farms and equipment, and hence occupational health and end user needs should be properly considered in technology development. Conclusion: The prevalence of musculoskeletal diseases stands out as a challenge for workers' occupational health. Measures should be implemented at the individual, organisational and regulatory levels and included in technology design.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safer workplaces in fish farming - strategies for mitigating occupational health and safety risks
    Holmen, Ingunn
    Thorvaldsen, Trine
    Salomonsen, Cecilie
    [J]. SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2022, 13 : S74 - S74
  • [2] A global perspective on addressing occupational safety and health hazards in the future of work
    Schulte, Paul A.
    [J]. MEDICINA DEL LAVORO, 2020, 111 (03): : 163 - 165
  • [3] Health care work environments, employee satisfaction, and patient safety: Care provider perspectives
    Rathert, Cheryl
    May, Douglas R.
    [J]. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (01) : 2 - 11
  • [4] The effect of occupational health and safety, work environment and discipline on employee performance in a consumer goods company
    Putri, D. O.
    Triatmanto, B.
    Setiyadi, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ICONISE) 2017, 2018, 337
  • [5] Occupational Health and Safety Influence on Work Quality and Efficiency from Management Perspective
    Wozny, Artur
    Zawada, Marcin
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 10023 - 10033
  • [6] The determinants of employee participation in occupational health and safety management
    Masso, Maert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2015, 21 (01) : 62 - 70
  • [7] Employee representation and occupational health and safety: The significance of Europe
    Walters, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1995, 8 (06) : 313 - 318
  • [8] Work, obesity, and occupational safety and health
    Schulte, Paul A.
    Wagner, Gregory R.
    Ostry, Aleck
    Blanciforti, Laura A.
    Icutlip, Robert G.
    Krajnak, Kristine M.
    Luster, Michael
    Munson, Albert E.
    O'Callaghan, James P.
    Parks, Christine G.
    Simeonova, Petia P.
    Miller, Diane B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 97 (03) : 428 - 436
  • [9] Frontiers in Occupational Health and Safety Changes in the World of Work and Impacts on Occupational Health and Safety
    Haldane, David
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2020, 70 (08): : 614 - 614
  • [10] Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement
    Dollard, Maureen F.
    Bakker, Arnold B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 83 (03) : 579 - 599