Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in living donor liver transplant and deceased donor liver transplant recipients

被引:20
|
作者
Jain, Ashok [1 ]
Venkataramanan, Raman [3 ]
Sharma, Rajeev [1 ]
Kwong, Tai [2 ]
Orloff, Mark [1 ]
Abt, Peter [1 ]
Kashyap, Randeep [1 ]
Tsoulfas, Georgious [1 ]
Batzold, Pam [1 ]
Williamson, Mary [1 ]
Bozorgzadeh, Adel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Div Solid Organ Transplant, Dept Surg, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Biochem, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
tacrolimus; liver transplantation; live donor; deceased donor; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181642c95
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. Hepatic dysfunction is an important determinant of the clearance of tacrolimus; however, the impact of reduced hepatic mass in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) patients on the drug exposure and clearance of tacrolimus is not known. Aim. The aim of the present study is to compare the dosage, concentration and pharmacokinetics parameters of tacrolimus between LDLT and deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. Patients and Methods. Daily doses used and trough concentrations measured were compared in 12 LDLT and 12 DDLT patients. Multiple blood samples were taken over one dosing interval after oral tacrolimus administration, and pharmacokinetics differences were compared. Results. The mean tacrolimus dosage in first 14 postoperative days was (0.06 mg/kg/day) for LDLT and (0.09 mg/kg/ day) for DDLT (P=0.0001). Despite the lower doses used, mean trough concentration was significantly greater in LDLT as compared with DDLT (8.8 +/- 2.5 ng/mL vs. 6.79 +/- 1.5 ng/mL, respectively, P=0.013). On the day of the pharmacokinetic Study, minimum Concentration (Cmin), 12-hr postdose concentration (Clast), and average concentration (Cavg) were significantly greater in LDLT as compared with DDLT (LDLT: 6.6 +/- 2.4 ng/mL, 7.2 +/- 1.8 ng/mL, 8.9 +/- 3.0 ng/mL; DDLT: 4.3 +/- 1.0 ng/mL, 4.9 +/- 1.6 ng/mL, 5.9 +/- 1.4 ng/mL, P=0.02, 0.04, and 0.02, respectively). Dose normalized AUC was 37.7% greater and clearance, 47.5% lower in LDLT as compared with DDLT. Conclusion. Although not statistically significant, the dose normalized AUC was 37.7% greater and clearance 47.5% lower in LDLT as compared with DDLT. An initial tacrolimus dose reduction of about 30-40% may be prudent in LDLT compared with DDLT recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 560
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in live donor and deceased donor liver transplant recipients.
    Jain, Ashok
    Venkatramanan, Raman
    Kwong, Tai
    Orloff, Mark
    Abt, Peter
    Kashyap, Randeep
    Tsoulfas, Geogious
    Mack, Cindy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 : 547 - 547
  • [2] Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in live donor and deceased donor liver transplant recipients
    Jain, A.
    Venkatramanan, R.
    Kwong, T.
    Orloff, M.
    Abt, P.
    Kashyap, R.
    Tsoulfas, G.
    Mack, C.
    Batzol, P.
    Williamson, M.
    Bozorgzadeh, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 46 : S60 - S60
  • [3] Comparison of Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid and Its Metabolites Between Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients and Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients
    Shen Baiyong
    Chen Bing
    Zhang Weixia
    Mao Huarong
    Shen Chuan
    Deng Xiaxing
    Zhan Xi
    Chen Hao
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (11) : 1473 - 1480
  • [4] Effect of hematocrit on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult living donor liver transplant recipients
    Minematsu, T
    Sugiyama, E
    Kusama, M
    Hori, S
    Yamada, Y
    Ohtani, H
    Sawada, Y
    Sato, H
    Takayama, T
    Sugawara, Y
    Makuuchi, M
    Iga, T
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (05) : 1506 - 1511
  • [5] Renal function after living donor liver transplant - Comparison with deceased donor liver transplant recipients.
    Pal, AK
    Douglas, DD
    Reddy, KS
    Heilman, RL
    Moss, AA
    Mulligan, DC
    Mazur, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 : 209 - 209
  • [6] Perioperative Bacterial Infections in Deceased Donor and Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients
    Varghese, Joy
    Gomathy, Narasimhan
    Rajashekhar, Perumalla
    Venugopal, Kota
    Olithselvan, Arikichenin
    Vivekanandan, Shanmugam
    Naresh, Shanmugam
    Sujatha, Chandrasekaran
    Vijaya, Srinivasan
    Jayanthi, Venkataraman
    Rela, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 2 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [7] Higher resource utilization in adult living donor liver transplant recipients compared to deceased donor liver transplant recipients.
    Conway, JD
    Russo, MW
    Johnson, M
    Shrestha, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 294 - 294
  • [8] Post-Transplant Complications in Recipients of Deceased and Living Donor Liver Transplant
    Samstein, B.
    Smith, A.
    Freise, C.
    Zimmerman, M.
    Baker, T.
    Olthoff, K.
    Fisher, R.
    Merion, R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 2 - 2
  • [9] Post-Transplant Complications in Recipients of Deceased and Living Donor Liver Transplant.
    Samstein, B.
    Smith, A.
    Freise, C.
    Zimmerman, M.
    Baker, T.
    Olthoff, K.
    Fisher, R.
    Merion, R.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 2 - 2
  • [10] Comparison of a Liver Transplant from Living Donor or deceased Donor
    Manekeller, Steffen
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2019, 144 (05):