A systematic review on methods used to evaluate patient preferences in psoriasis treatments

被引:27
|
作者
Gutknecht, M. [1 ]
Schaarschmidt, M. -L. [1 ]
Herrlein, O. [1 ]
Augustin, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Hlth Serv Res Dermatol & Nursing IVDP, German Ctr Hlth Serv Res Dermatol CVderm, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; HEALTH-STATE UTILITIES; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TREATMENT SATISFACTION; PLAQUE PSORIASIS; ELICITATION; ARTHRITIS; NEED; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/jdv.13749
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
In the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, recently approved medications undergo the early benefit assessment' in Germany. Psoriasis treatments differ in a multiplicity of characteristics like side-effects, beneficial effect, cost and process attributes, which serve to evaluate the patient-relevant benefit compared to standard treatments. Patient preferences might help to aggregate the various patient-relevant outcomes into a single measure. In this context, besides the calculation of the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) refers to methods of multi-criteria decision making or preference evaluation like analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis. The objective was to give an overview of methods that have been used in international published studies to evaluate patient preferences in psoriasis treatments. The review is based on a systematic literature research on December 2014 in selected electronic databases, using the keywords psoriasis' and preferences' as well as the name of specific methods, known from the literature to evaluate patient preferences. The search resulted 389 hits without duplicates. 21 articles met the inclusion criteria. Depending on the study objective, preferences were elicited for health states, health state domains, treatment attributes or treatment alternatives focusing on different outcomes of preferences. Thereby, different methods were used in included studies. For this reason, there is no single outcome available that might be useful in the benefit assessment of the IQWiG. Willingness-to-pay, often included as part of a conjoint analysis, was the predominant method to elicit preferences. So far, the analytic hierarchy process has not been used in psoriasis studies. The use of this method in future studies might provide new essential knowledge in the evaluation of patient preferences in psoriasis treatments. However, a clear assignment when to use which method is not given by the IQWiG and should be prioritized.
引用
收藏
页码:1454 / 1464
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methods used to measure patient preferences in psoriasis treatments and recommendations of the German IQWiG
    Gutknecht, M.
    Herrlein, O.
    Augustin, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 171 (06) : E162 - E163
  • [2] Psoriasis patient preferences for topical drugs: a systematic review
    Svendsen, Mathias Tiedemann
    Feldman, Steven R.
    Tiedemann, Sylvia Naiga
    Sorensen, Anne Sofie Stochholm
    Rivas, Cecilie Marie Ringgaard
    Andersen, Klaus Ejner
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2021, 32 (05) : 478 - 483
  • [3] METHODS USED TO MEASURE PATIENT PREFERENCES IN PSORIASIS TREATMENTS - AN OVERVIEW WITH REGARDS TO THE GERMAN IQWIG AND G-BA
    Gutknecht, M.
    Herrlein, O.
    Augustin, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A574 - A574
  • [4] Differences between physician and patient preferences for cancer treatments: a systematic review
    Mengqian Zhang
    Xiaoning He
    Jing Wu
    Feng Xie
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 23
  • [5] Differences between physician and patient preferences for cancer treatments: a systematic review
    Zhang, Mengqian
    He, Xiaoning
    Wu, Jing
    Xie, Feng
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [6] Patient preferences for psoriasis treatments: impact of treatment experience
    Schaarschmidt, M. -L.
    Umar, N.
    Schmieder, A.
    Terris, D. D.
    Goebeler, M.
    Goerdt, S.
    Peitsch, W. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2013, 27 (02) : 187 - 198
  • [7] A systematic review of treatments for guttate psoriasis
    Chalmers, RJG
    O'Sullivan, T
    Owen, CM
    Griffiths, CEM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 145 (06) : 891 - 894
  • [8] Combination treatments for psoriasis: A systematic review
    Bailey, E. E.
    Alikhan, A.
    Armstrong, A. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 130 : S52 - S52
  • [9] Treatments for inverse psoriasis: a systematic review
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    Pithadia, Deeti J.
    Lee, Erica B.
    Wu, Jashin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2020, 31 (08) : 786 - 793
  • [10] Methods used to evaluate teacher well-being: A systematic review
    Fox, Harriet B.
    Walter, Heather L.
    Ball, Karly B.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2023, 60 (10) : 4177 - 4198