Effects of timber harvest on carbon pools in Ozark forests

被引:18
|
作者
Li, Qinglin [1 ]
Chen, Jiquan [2 ]
Moorhead, Daryl L. [2 ]
DeForest, Jared L. [3 ]
Jensen, Randy [4 ]
Henderson, Rachel [5 ]
机构
[1] Timberline Nat Res Grp, Kelowna, BC V1Y 4R1, Canada
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Environm Sci, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Ohio Univ, Dept Environm & Plant Biol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[4] Missouri Dept Conservat, Ellington, MO 63638 USA
[5] Rocky Mt Biol Labs, Crested Butte, CO 81224 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1139/X07-086
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We quantified and compared carbon (C) pools at a Missouri Ozark experimental forest 8 years after different harvest treatments. Total C pools were 182, 170, and 130 Mg C.ha(-1) for the control (no-harvest management; NHM), single-tree, uneven-age management (UAM), and clearcut even-age management (EAM) stands, respectively. Harvesting reduced the live tree C pool by 31% in the UAM, 93% in EAM stands, and increased the coarse woody debris (CWD) C pool by 50% in UAM and 176% for EAM, compared with NHM stands. UAM significantly (p = 0.02) increased the mineral soil C pool by 14%, whereas EAM had no effect. More interestingly, the distribution of C among various components (i.e., live, dead wood, CWD, litter, and soil) ranged from 0.7% to 29% on NHM stands and from 0.1% to 43% on EAM stands. Soil nitrogen (N) (%) was significantly correlated with soil C (%) in the UAM stands, whereas soil temperature was negatively related to live tree C. Soil N (%) and canopy cover were significantly correlated with live tree and soil C (%) pools at EAM stands. Our results revealed that the largest C pool in these forests was living trees. The soil and CWD C pool sizes suggest the importance of dynamics of decaying harvest debris, which influences N retention.
引用
收藏
页码:2337 / 2348
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of agriculture and timber harvest on carbon sequestration in the eastern US forests
    Dangal, Shree R. S.
    Felzer, Benjamin S.
    Hurteau, Matthew D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2014, 119 (01) : 35 - 54
  • [2] Timber harvest as the predominant disturbance regime in northeastern US forests: effects of harvest intensification
    Brown, Michelle L.
    Canham, Charles D.
    Murphy, Lora
    Donovan, Therese M.
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (03):
  • [3] Effects of timber harvest on Cimicifuga elata, a rare plant of western forests
    Kaye, TN
    Kirkland, M
    [J]. NORTHWEST SCIENCE, 1999, 73 (03) : 159 - 167
  • [4] Net carbon sequestration implications of intensified timber harvest in Northeastern US forests
    Brown, Michelle L.
    Canham, Charles D.
    Buchholz, Thomas
    Gunn, John S.
    Donovan, Therese M.
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (02):
  • [5] Harvest-associated disturbance in upland Ozark forests of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project
    Bruhn, JN
    Wetteroff, JJ
    Mihail, JD
    Jensen, RG
    Pickens, JB
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND MISSOURI OZARK FOREST ECOSYSTEM PROJECT SYMPOSIUM: POST-TREATMENT RESULTS OF THE LANDSCAPE EXPERIMENT, 2002, 227 : 130 - 146
  • [6] Modelling the effects of climate change and timber harvest on the forests of central Nova Scotia, Canada
    Steenberg, James W. N.
    Duinker, Peter N.
    Bush, Peter G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2013, 70 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [7] Modelling the effects of climate change and timber harvest on the forests of central Nova Scotia, Canada
    James W. N. Steenberg
    Peter N. Duinker
    Peter G. Bush
    [J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2013, 70 : 61 - 73
  • [8] Improved timber harvest techniques maintain biodiversity in tropical forests
    Bicknell, Jake E.
    Struebig, Matthew J.
    Edwards, David P.
    Davies, Zoe G.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (23) : R1119 - R1120
  • [9] Bad harvest? The timber trade and the degradation of the world's forests
    Gale, F
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1997, 49 (03): : 375 - 376
  • [10] Harvest impacts in uneven-aged and even-aged Missouri ozark forests
    Dwyer, JP
    Dey, DC
    Walter, WD
    Jensen, RG
    [J]. NORTHERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY, 2004, 21 (04): : 187 - 193