Software for image registration: Algorithms, accuracy, efficacy

被引:73
|
作者
Hutton, BF [1 ]
Braun, M
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Westmead Hosp, Dept Nucl Med & Ultrasound, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Dept Appl Phys, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1053/snuc.2003.127309
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Image registration is finding increased clinical use both in aiding diagnosis and guiding therapy. There are numerous algorithms for registration, which all involve maximizing a measure of similarity between a transformed floating image and a fixed reference image. The choice of the similarity measure depends, to some extent, on the application. Methods based on the use of the joint intensity histogram have become popular because of their flexibility and robustness. A distinction is made between rigid-body and non-rigid transformations. The latter-are needed for inter-subject registration or intra-subject registration in cases where the region of the body of interest is not considered rigid. Non-rigid transformation is normally achieved using a global model of the deformation but can also be defined by a set of locally rigid transformations, each constrained to a small block in the image. There is scope for further research on the incorporation of appropriate constraints, especially for the application of non-rigid transformations to nuclear medicine studies. Most of the initial practical concerns regarding image registration have been overcome and there is increasing availability of commercial software. There are several approaches to the validation of registration software, with validation of non-rigid algorithms being particularly difficult. Studies have demonstrated the accuracy on the order of half a pixel for both intra- and inter-modality registration (typically 2 to 3 mm). Although hardware-based registration has now become possible by using dual-modality instruments, software-based registration will continue to play an important role in nuclear medicine. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 192
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Assessment of the Quality and Accuracy of a Commercial Deformable Image Registration (DIR) Software
    Jurkovic, I.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Stathakis, S.
    Kirby, N.
    Mavroidis, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E401 - E401
  • [3] Matching Accuracy Comparison Between Five Different Deformable Image Registration Algorithms
    Horita, M.
    Hayashi, N.
    Kato, I.
    Yamanaka, D.
    Yasui, K.
    Takemura, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E734 - E734
  • [4] Influence of Image Registration Algorithms and Noise Levels On the Accuracy of Fractional Regional Ventilation
    Liu, Y.
    Badea, C.
    Mistry, N.
    D'Souza, W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3198 - 3199
  • [5] Accuracy of a deformable image registration software in shape and volume recovery of phantom images
    Pallotta, S.
    Simontacchi, G.
    Livi, L.
    Bucciolini, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S267 - S267
  • [6] ALGORITHMS FOR FAST IMAGE REGISTRATION
    REZAIE, B
    SRINATH, MD
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1984, 20 (06) : 716 - 728
  • [7] Accuracy of iView and PIPSpro registration software
    Pallotta, Stefania
    Ceroti, Marco
    Bucciolini, Marta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 11 (04): : 283 - 290
  • [8] Evaluation of the deformable image registration algorithm in Velocity image registration software
    Fullarton, R.
    Ghirmay, K.
    Dom, W.
    Crees, L.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S974 - S974
  • [9] Digital Image Correlation with Enhanced Accuracy and Efficiency: A Comparison of Two Subpixel Registration Algorithms
    B. Pan
    B. Wang
    [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2016, 56 : 1395 - 1409
  • [10] Digital Image Correlation with Enhanced Accuracy and Efficiency: A Comparison of Two Subpixel Registration Algorithms
    Pan, B.
    Wang, B.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 2016, 56 (08) : 1395 - 1409