Gender and Socio-Intentionality: Why Are "Things" the Way They Are?

This comment responds to the four target articles published in this special issue on "Women in Psychology and Related Sciences." It is suggested that the articles have explanatory power for answering the question, "Why are things the way they are?" when it comes to gender issues, by drawing on history, theory, feminism, political thought, and in short, on the psychological humanities. The role of intersectionality and neoliberalism in the articles as well as in everyday life are discussed, and consequences for the analysis of gender are presented. It is argued that psychology needs queering, but that gender remains a significant category when analyzing psychology and related disciplines. It is concluded that resistance needs solidarity and that the Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology will benefit from the inclusion of feminist and women's perspectives.