Pathophysiology and prophylaxis of stress ulcer in intensive care unit patients

被引:105
|
作者
Stollman, N
Metz, DC
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Hlth Syst, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
pathophysiology; prophylaxis; ulcer;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.10.003
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Gastrointestinal complications frequently occur in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Of these, ulceration and bleeding related to stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) can lengthen hospitalization and increase mortality. The purpose of this review is to discuss the many risk factors and underlying illnesses that have a role in the pathophysiology of SRMD and evaluate the evidence pertaining to SRMD prophylaxis in the intensive care unit population. Suppressing acid production is fundamental to preventing stress-related mucosal ulceration and clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding. Traditional prophylactic options for SRMD in critically ill patients include antacids, sucralfate, histamine(2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and proton pump inhibitors. Many clinicians prescribe intermittent infusions of H2RAs for stress ulcer prophylaxis, a practice that has not been approved for this indication and may not provide the necessary degree or duration of acid suppression required to prevent stress ulcer-related bleeding. New data suggest that proton pump inhibitors suppress acid production more completely in critically ill patients, but more studies are required to assess their clinical effectiveness and safety for this indication. The prophylactic regimen chosen to prevent stress ulcer bleeding should take into account the risk factors and underlying disease state of individual patients to provide the best therapy to those most likely to benefit. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 45
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit
    Baykara, Zehra Nur
    Alparslan, Volkan
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE-TURK YOGUN BAKIM DERGISI, 2018, 16 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [2] Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit
    Krag, Mette
    Perner, Anders
    Moller, Morten H.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 22 (02) : 186 - 190
  • [3] Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit
    Kuo, Fu-Chen
    Wu, Deng-Chyang
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 1 (02) : 36 - 37
  • [4] Assessment of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Pattern in the Intensive Care Unit Patients
    Aramesh, Mahshid
    Hasanloie, Mohammad Amin Valizade
    Aghlmand, Siamak
    Sharifi, Hamdollah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL & INTENSIVE CARE, 2022, 13 (01): : 8 - 11
  • [5] Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients
    Gupta, Divya
    Bhalotra, Anju R.
    Singh, Rahil
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 24 (03) : 160 - 167
  • [6] Prophylaxis for stress ulcer bleeding in the intensive care unit
    Avendano-Reyes, J. M.
    Jaramillo-Ramirez, H.
    [J]. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2014, 79 (01): : 50 - 55
  • [7] Guideline for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit
    Madsen, Kristian Rorbaek
    Lorentzen, Kristian
    Clausen, Niels
    Oberg, Emilie
    Kirkegaard, Peter Roy Casparij
    Maymann-Holler, Nana
    Moller, Morten Hylander
    [J]. DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 61 (03):
  • [8] Factors affecting the overuse of stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients in the intensive care unit
    Hope, William W.
    Schmelzer, Thomas
    Kim, Aram
    Salashour, Jonathan
    Barrett, M. C.
    Sing, Ronald F.
    [J]. CHEST, 2007, 132 (04) : 564S - 564S
  • [9] Intensive care unit stress ulcer prophylaxis: is it still needed?
    Almadi, Majid A.
    Barkun, Alan N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2016, 36 (06) : 434 - 435
  • [10] Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit
    Glaser, Natalie
    Sartipy, Ulrik
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 62 (02)