Improving the efficiency of soybean breeding with high-throughput canopy phenotyping

被引:34
|
作者
Moreira, Fabiana Freitas [1 ]
Hearst, Anthony Ahau [2 ]
Cherkauer, Keith Aric [2 ]
Rainey, Katy Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, 915 West State St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, 225 South Univ St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Soybean; High-throughput phenotyping; Breeding; Canopy coverage; ACC; INCREASING PLANT-POPULATION; WEED SUPPRESSIVE ABILITY; DIVERSE MATURITY GROUPS; LIGHT INTERCEPTION; BIOMASS RESPONSES; GRAIN-YIELD; SELECTION; ACCURACY; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1186/s13007-019-0519-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: In the early stages of plant breeding programs high-quality phenotypes are still a constraint to improve genetic gain. New field-based high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) platforms have the capacity to rapidly assess thousands of plots in a field with high spatial and temporal resolution, with the potential to measure secondary traits correlated to yield throughout the growing season. These secondary traits may be key to select more time and most efficiently soybean lines with high yield potential. Soybean average canopy coverage (ACC), measured by unmanned aerial systems (UAS), is highly heritable, with a high genetic correlation with yield. The objective of this study was to compare the direct selection for yield with indirect selection using ACC and using ACC as a covariate in the yield prediction model (Yield vertical bar ACC) in early stages of soybean breeding. In 2015 and 2016 we grew progeny rows (PR) and collected yield and days to maturity (R8) in a typical way and canopy coverage using a UAS carrying an RGB camera. The best soybean lines were then selected with three parameters, Yield, ACC and Yield|ACC, and advanced to preliminary yield trials (PYT). Results: We found that for the PYT in 2016, after adjusting yield for R8, there was no significant difference among the mean performances of the lines selected based on ACC and Yield. In the PYT in 2017 we found that the highest yield mean was from the lines directly selected for yield, but it may be due to environmental constraints in the canopy growth. Our results indicated that PR selection using Yield|ACC selected the most top-ranking lines in advanced yield trials. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the value of aerial HTP platforms for early stages of plant breeding. Though ACC selection did not result in the best performance lines in the second year of selections, our results indicate that ACC has a role in the effective selection of high-yielding soybean lines.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving the efficiency of soybean breeding with high-throughput canopy phenotyping
    Fabiana Freitas Moreira
    Anthony Ahau Hearst
    Keith Aric Cherkauer
    Katy Martin Rainey
    [J]. Plant Methods, 15
  • [2] Association between unmanned aerial vehicle high-throughput canopy phenotyping and soybean yield
    Casagrande, Cleiton Renato
    Sant'ana, Gustavo Cesar
    Meda, Anderson Rotter
    Garcia, Alexandre
    Souza Carneiro, Pedro Crescencio
    Nardino, Maicon
    Borem, Aluizio
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 114 (03) : 1581 - 1598
  • [3] High-Throughput Phenotyping: Application in Maize Breeding
    Resende, Ewerton Lelys
    Bruzi, Adriano Teodoro
    Cardoso, Everton da Silva
    Carneiro, Vinicius Quintao
    Pereira de Souza, Vitorio Antonio
    Frois Correa Barros, Paulo Henrique
    Pereira, Raphael Rodrigues
    [J]. AGRIENGINEERING, 2024, 6 (02): : 1078 - 1092
  • [4] Satellite imagery for high-throughput phenotyping in breeding plots
    Pinto, Francisco
    Zaman-Allah, Mainassara
    Reynolds, Matthew
    Schulthess, Urs
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [5] High-throughput field phenotyping of soybean: Spotting an ideotype
    Roth, Lukas
    Barendregt, Christoph
    Betrix, Claude-Alain
    Hund, Andreas
    Walter, Achim
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 269
  • [6] Breeding Differently—the Digital Revolution: High-Throughput Phenotyping and Genotyping
    Anthony T. Slater
    Noel O. I. Cogan
    Brendan C. Rodoni
    Hans D. Daetwyler
    Benjamin J. Hayes
    Brittney Caruana
    Pieter E. Badenhorst
    German C. Spangenberg
    John W. Forster
    [J]. Potato Research, 2017, 60 : 337 - 352
  • [7] Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
    Luis Araus, Jose
    Cairns, Jill E.
    [J]. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 19 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [8] High-throughput phenotyping
    Natalie de Souza
    [J]. Nature Methods, 2010, 7 (1) : 36 - 36
  • [9] High-throughput phenotyping
    Gehan, Malia A.
    Kellogg, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 104 (04) : 505 - 508
  • [10] High-throughput phenotyping
    de Souza, Natalie
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2010, 7 (01) : 36 - 36