Policy to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Is Agricultural Methane a Special Case?

被引:8
|
作者
Lynch, John [1 ]
Garnett, Tara [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Phys, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1746-692X.12317
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Climate change mitigation will require significant efforts from all emitting sectors, including agriculture. However, agricultural emission reduction measures raise specific concerns, both in respect of their distinct climate outcomes and how their implementation might support or frustrate wider objectives. We highlight some special characteristics regarding agricultural methane emissions. As methane is a relatively short-lived gas, we do not have the same strong physical requirement to completely eliminate net methane emissions as we do for carbon dioxide. An appreciation of the distinct nature and impacts of carbon dioxide and methane can bring nuance to discussions; especially around what different sectors must be expected to achieve, and thus help avoid negative trade-offs that might result from heavy-handed policy interventions. Nevertheless, significant and rapid methane emission reductions do remain important in realistically achieving our overall climate objectives. A number of technical measures to reduce ruminant methane are highlighted, but are not without their own challenges; and we are unlikely to meet climate or other environmental targets without systemic changes to the total food system, including overall consumption patterns. The appropriate policy tools to achieve these changes are emerging as a key, but contested, concern in Europe and beyond, making it vital we work through these arguments in a transparent manner.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agricultural development programmes reduce greenhouse gas emissions
    Juliana Gil
    [J]. Nature Food, 2022, 3 : 978 - 978
  • [2] Agricultural development programmes reduce greenhouse gas emissions
    Gil, Juliana
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2022, 3 (12): : 978 - 978
  • [3] Policy Options to Reduce Electricity Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Freebairn, John
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 51 (04) : 474 - 485
  • [4] A Comparison of Policy Instruments to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Freebairn, John
    [J]. ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2016, 35 (03): : 204 - 215
  • [5] A Portfolio Policy Package to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Freebairn, John
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (04)
  • [6] Development of aim for analysing policy options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
    Kainuma, M
    Matsuoka, Y
    Morita, T
    [J]. LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS 1998 (LSS'98), VOL 1, 1999, : 575 - 580
  • [7] Methane emissions from agricultural ponds are underestimated in national greenhouse gas inventories
    Malerba, Martino E.
    de Kluyver, Tertius
    Wright, Nicholas
    Schuster, Lukas
    Macreadie, Peter I.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [8] Including Methane Emissions from Agricultural Ponds in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
    Malerba, Martino E.
    de Kluyver, Tertius
    Wright, Nicholas
    Omosalewa, Odebiri
    Macreadie, Peter I.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (19) : 8349 - 8359
  • [9] Methane emissions from agricultural ponds are underestimated in national greenhouse gas inventories
    Martino E. Malerba
    Tertius de Kluyver
    Nicholas Wright
    Lukas Schuster
    Peter I. Macreadie
    [J]. Communications Earth & Environment, 3
  • [10] Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use
    Fine, Pinchas
    Nadas, Efrat
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 416 : 289 - 299