Environmental and economic benefits of applying green building concepts in Kuwait

被引:23
|
作者
Alsulaili, Abdulrahman D. [1 ]
Al-Matrouk, Marwa F. [1 ]
Al-Baghli, Rabab A. [1 ]
Al-Enezi, Amal F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Coll Engn & Petr, POB 5969, Kuwait 13060, Kuwait
关键词
Residential houses; Water savings; Energy savings; HVAC; Eco-friendly materials; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; WATER; DESALINATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-019-00352-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rapid increase of residential buildings in Kuwait is a major contributor in resource consumption, waste generation and CO2 emissions. This paper aims to introduce a new concept of green buildings in Kuwait for saving water, energy and using eco-friendly materials in residential houses to develop more sustainable and high-performance buildings. For the purpose of evaluating the conventional buildings impacts and clarifying the resident's awareness towards the green building concept, a survey questionnaire was designed using Google Forms. In addition, a case study of converting a conventional building into a green building was studied, with assurance that the owner requirements were implemented. The overall water saved (in terms of consumption and bill cost) was 46%. Energy waste from light consumption was reduced by approximately 86% by using LED lights, timers and sensors, with annual cost savings of 54%. Due to this reduction, a great decrease in CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions was achieved (approximately 65,893 kg per year). Moreover, two different design software tools (HAP and SketchUp) were applied for HVAC cooling loads and PV panels, respectively. By installing high-quality insulation and ducts and double-glass low-e windows, the HVAC cooling load was reduced by approximately 25%, which contributed to the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions (approximately 90,262 kg per year). The annual electricity production generated from the PV panel system was 6770 kW h. To enhance indoor air quality, an eco-friendly paint was used as an alternative to normal paint, resulting in an 88% reduction in VOCs.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3371 / 3387
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental and economic benefits of applying green building concepts in Kuwait
    Abdulrahman D. Alsulaili
    Marwa F. Al-Matrouk
    Rabab A. Al-Baghli
    Amal F. Al-Enezi
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 3371 - 3387
  • [2] Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Green Building
    Ding, Wenxiang
    Zhao, Yuhong
    Ji, Xu
    FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-3, 2013, 368-370 : 1135 - +
  • [3] Green Roof Offers Economic and Environmental Benefits
    1600, John Wiley and Sons Inc (39):
  • [4] Green Roof Delivers Economic and Environmental Benefits
    不详
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2013, 105 (10): : 36 - 37
  • [5] Analysis of Incremental Costs and Economic Benefits for Green Building
    Cao, Tianzhuo
    Feng, Xiaoping
    Wang, Qiang
    2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (ICEEP 2015), 2015, : 2878 - 2883
  • [6] The economic benefits of a green building - Evidence from Malaysia
    Dwaikat, Luay N.
    Ali, Kherun N.
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2018, 18 : 448 - 453
  • [7] The approaches of measuring environmental costs and benefits of green building
    Han, Y
    Liu, CB
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, 2003, : 353 - 355
  • [8] Social, environmental, economic, and health benefits of green spaces
    Aldous, D. E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HORTICULTURAL PLANTS IN URBAN AND PERI-URBAN LIFE, 2007, (762): : 171 - 185
  • [9] Economic and environmental benefits of thermal insulation of building external walls
    Dylewski, Robert
    Adamczyk, Janusz
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 46 (12) : 2615 - 2623
  • [10] Green roof valuation: A probabilistic economic analysis of environmental benefits
    Clark, Corrie
    Adriaens, Peter
    Talbot, F. Brian
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (06) : 2155 - 2161