Sacrocolpopexy experience with a novel robotic surgical platform

被引:5
|
作者
Sassani, Jessica C. [1 ]
Clark, Stephanie Glass [1 ]
McGough, Christine E. [2 ]
Shepherd, Jonathan P. [3 ]
Bonidie, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Urogynecol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Farmington, CT USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Sacrocolpopexy; New technology; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-022-05155-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to describe early experience performing sacrocolpopexy using a novel robotic surgical platform. Methods This is a case series of all women who underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy using a new robotics platform (TransEnterix Senhance) between January 2019 and July 2021. All sacrocolpopexies were performed by a single Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive surgeon at a large academic institution. Perioperative information including complications was abstracted from the medical record. Anatomical recurrence was defined as any anatomical point at or past the hymen (>= 0). Data are descriptive, with Mann-Whitney U test used for comparison of operative time between the first and second half of the patients. Results A total of 25 sacrocolpopexies were performed using the new robotics platform. Mean age was 62.3 years (+/- 9.2) and mean BMI was 26.5 (+/- 3.8). Ten (40.0%) patients had a prior hysterectomy. Most (n = 21, 84.0%) had stage III or IV prolapse preoperatively. Mean operative time was 210.2 min (+/- 48.6) and median estimated blood loss was 35 ml (IQR 25-50). Mean operative time decreased between the first and second half of the patients (231.7 min vs 190.3 min, p = 0.047). There were no major intraoperative complications. Median follow-up time was 16 weeks (IQR 4-34) and there were no subjective recurrences or retreatments during this period. Two patients (8.0%) had anatomical recurrence without subjective bother. There were two postoperative readmissions (8.0%) within 30 days for small bowel obstruction, one treated surgically and the other with nonsurgical management. Conclusions Our case series demonstrates feasibility and successful early adoption of a new robotics platform for robotic sacrocolpopexy.
引用
收藏
页码:3255 / 3260
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sacrocolpopexy experience with a novel robotic surgical platform
    Jessica C. Sassani
    Stephanie Glass Clark
    Christine E. McGough
    Jonathan P. Shepherd
    Michael Bonidie
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 3255 - 3260
  • [2] ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY: THE LEARNING CURVE FOR A NOVEL SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
    Childs, M. A.
    Routh, J. C.
    Chow, G. K.
    Elliott, D. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A205 - A206
  • [3] Integration of a Robotic Platform for Sacrocolpopexy in Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Novel Surgical Technique
    Guan, Xiaoming
    Guan, Zhenkun
    Koythong, Tamisa
    Liu, Juan
    Delgado, Stephanie
    Wang, Qianqing
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2021, 154 : 109 - 114
  • [4] The impact of institutional experience on robotic sacrocolpopexy
    Nosti P.A.
    Andy U.
    Desale S.
    Gutman R.E.
    Harvie H.S.
    Lowenstein L.
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2014, 8 (4) : 343 - 347
  • [5] Robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Technique and experience
    Whelan, Christopher M.
    Kramer, Brandan A.
    Powell, Timothy
    Schwartz, Bradley F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 608 - 608
  • [6] Robotic sacrocolpopexy experience in a high volume center
    Morselli, Simone
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Mari, Andrea
    Bigazzi, Barbara
    Di Camillo, Matteo
    Pierangelo, Verrienti
    Sebastianelli, Arcangelo
    Campi, Riccardo
    Sforza, Simone
    Tuccio, Agostino
    Vittori, Gianni
    Liaci, Andrea
    Masieri, Lorenzo
    Siena, Giampaolo
    Li Marzi, Vincenzo
    Serni, Sergio
    Minervini, Andrea
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 : S29 - S30
  • [7] Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
    Hoke, Tanya P.
    Goldstein, Howard
    Saks, Emily K.
    Vakili, Babak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (05) : 892 - 895
  • [8] VALIDATED SURGICAL STEPS OF THE ROBOTIC ASSISTED SACROCOLPOPEXY OPERATION
    Dallas, Kai
    Ackerman, A. Lenore
    Eilber, Karyn
    Rogo-Gupta, Lisa
    Scott, Victoria
    Troung, Mireille
    Cohen, Tara
    Anger, Jennifer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E45 - E46
  • [9] Validated surgical steps of the robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy operation
    Dallas, Kai
    Ackerman, A. Lenore
    Eilber, Karyn
    Rogo-Gupta, Lisa
    Scott, Victoria
    Troung, Mireille
    Cohen, Tara
    Anger, Jennifer
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S274 - S276
  • [10] VESPA ROBOTIC LESS: DESCRIPTION OF A NOVEL ROBOTIC PLATFORM AND INITIAL LABORATORY EXPERIENCE
    Haber, G. P.
    White, M. A.
    Autorino, R.
    Khanna, R.
    Forest, S.
    Yang, B.
    Altunrende, F.
    Stein, R. J.
    Kaouk, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A10 - A10