Patients' preferences for MR angiography and duplex US in the work-up of peripheral arterial disease

被引:10
|
作者
Visser, K
Bosch, JL
Leiner, T
van Engelshoven, JMA
Passchier, J
Hunink, MGM
机构
[1] Univ Rotterdam, Med Ctr, Erasmus MC,ART Program, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Rotterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Rotterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol & Psychotherapy, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] State Univ Limburg Hosp, Dept Radiol, NL-6201 BX Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
patient preferences assessment; diagnostic work-up; peripheral arterial disease; magnetic resonance; duplex ultrasound;
D O I
10.1016/S1078-5884(03)00387-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose. To measure patients' preferences for magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and duplex ultrasound (US) in the imaging work-up of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods. Ninety-eight patients, who underwent both MR angiography and duplex US, received a questionnaire by mail and their preferences for imaging- work-up were assessed in a telephone interview. The questionnaire consisted of one question on which imaging test they preferred, a rating scale score ranging from 0 (not bothersome at all) to 10 (extremely bothersome), and specific questions on whether patients experienced discomfort due to the imaging work-up. Responses were presented as means and frequencies, and differences were tested by non-parametric tests. Results. Half of the patient population (50%) had no preference for MR angiography or duplex US, 41% had a preference for MR angiography, and 9% had a preference for duplex US. The average rating scale scores for MR angiography (1.6) and duplex US (1.7) were not significantly different (p = 0.53). Four out of 98 (4%) patients responded that they experienced pain during the MR angiography versus 18 (18%) for duplex US (p = 0.001). Eight out of 98 (8%) patients responded that they were anxious during the MR angiography versus 1(1%) for duplex US (p = 0.02). Conclusion. The results suggest that the majority of patients have no preference between MR angiography and duplex US in the diagnostic work-up of PAD. Among patients who do have a preference, MR angiography was preferred over duplex us.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 543
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE - PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF MR ANGIOGRAPHY AND COLOR DUPLEX US WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY
    MULLIGAN, SA
    MATSUDA, T
    LANZER, P
    GROSS, GM
    ROUTH, WD
    KELLER, FS
    KOSLIN, DB
    BERLAND, LL
    FIELDS, MD
    DOYLE, M
    CRANNEY, GB
    LEE, JY
    POHOST, GM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (03) : 695 - 700
  • [2] Peripheral arterial disease: Comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis
    Leiner, T
    Kessels, AGH
    Nelemans, PJ
    Vasbinder, GBC
    de Haan, MW
    Kitslaar, PEJHM
    Ho, KYJAM
    Tordoir, JHM
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) : 699 - 708
  • [3] Targets for a new diagnostic imaging modality in the work-up of peripheral arterial disease
    Visser, K
    Kock, MC
    Hunink, MG
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 154 - 154
  • [4] Whole-body MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease
    Nielsen, Yousef Jesper Wirenfeldt
    [J]. DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 57 (12)
  • [5] Peripheral arterial disease: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US - A meta-analysis
    Visser, K
    Hunink, MGM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) : 67 - 77
  • [6] Peripheral arterial disease: Clinical and cost comparisons between duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography - A multicenter randomized trial
    de Vries, Marianne
    Ouwendijk, Rody
    Flobbe, Karin
    Nelemans, Patricia J.
    Kessels, Alphons G.
    Schurink, GeertWillem H.
    van der Vliet, J. Adam
    Heijstraten, Frans M. J.
    Cuypers, Philippe W. M.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    van Engelshoven, Jos M. A.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    de Haan, Michiel W.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 240 (02) : 401 - 410
  • [7] Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: role of MR angiography
    Gozzi, M
    Amorico, MG
    Colopi, S
    Favali, M
    Gallo, E
    Torricelli, P
    Polverini, I
    Gargiulo, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2006, 111 (02): : 225 - 237
  • [8] MR angiography of patients with peripheral arterial disease before and after transluminal angioplasty
    Davis, CP
    Schopke, WD
    Seifert, B
    Schneider, E
    Pfammatter, T
    Debatin, JF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (04) : 1027 - 1034
  • [9] MR Lymphangiography for Assessment of Focal Dermal Backflow for Presurgical Work-Up in Patients with Peripheral Lymphoedema
    Strobl, F. F.
    Weiss, M.
    Wallmichrath, J.
    Baumeister, R.
    Reiser, M. F.
    Notohamiprodjo, M.
    [J]. HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2012, 44 (06) : 329 - 333
  • [10] Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison
    Huegli, RW
    Aschwanden, M
    Bongartz, G
    Jaeger, K
    Heidecker, HG
    Thalhammer, C
    Schulte, AC
    Hashagen, C
    Jacob, AL
    Bilecen, D
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (03) : 901 - 908