Perceptions of the impact of the new AACSB standards on faculty qualifications

被引:3
|
作者
Henninger, EA [1 ]
机构
[1] Lycoming Coll, Williamsport, PA 17701 USA
关键词
business schools; education; management; qualifications;
D O I
10.1108/09534819810234832
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The International Association for Management Education (AACSB) historically has been a strong supporter of the business disciplinary communities that have served to create and protect a much narrower definition of faculty qualifications. Research has supported the notion that business schools have often selected and rewarded faculty for their academic credentials and for their ability to conduct empirical research regardless of institutional type. In recent studies following the introduction of the new AACSB standards, deans surveyed generally anticipate only modest changes in the credentials and research expectations for their faculties. This multiple case study investigated dean and management and marketing chair and faculty perceptions of the potential impact of the new AACSB faculty qualifications standards on hiring, tenure, and promotion criteria at four comprehensive universities. Generally, respondents expected little opportunity for selection, tenure or promotion of faculty with doctorates outside traditional business disciplines and no opportunity for those considered professionally qualified.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / +
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Judging Academic Qualifications, Professional Qualifications, and Participation of Faculty Using AACSB Guidelines
    Koys, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2008, 83 (04) : 207 - 213
  • [2] Impact of AACSB accreditation on education quality: perceptions of faculty in an accredited school in Japan
    Ito, Hiroshi
    Takeuchi, Shinichi
    Yokoyama, Kenji
    Makita, Yukihiro
    Ishii, Masamichi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 38 (03) : 769 - 785
  • [3] AACSB Standards and Accounting Faculty's Intellectual Contributions
    Brian Lee, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2008, 83 (03) : 173 - 179
  • [4] An Examination of AACSB Member School Processes for Evaluating Intellectual Contributions and Academic and Professional Qualifications of Faculty
    Smith, Kenneth
    Rosenberg, Donald
    Haight, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2009, 84 (04) : 219 - 227
  • [5] Navigating AACSB International Standard 3: Strategies to effectively manage faculty sufficiency and qualifications ratios
    Landry, Brett J. L.
    Scherer, Robert F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2023, 98 (08) : 492 - 501
  • [6] AACSB STANDARDS
    GARNER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1965, 119 (01): : 17 - 17
  • [7] The new AACSB accreditation standards: A prospect of tiering?
    McKenna, JF
    Cotton, CC
    VanAuken, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 1997, 10 (06) : 491 - &
  • [8] AACSB International's 2013 accreditation standards Speculative implications for faculty and deans
    Miles, Morgan P.
    Franklin, Geralyn McClure
    Heriot, Kirk
    Hadley, Linda
    Hazeldine, Mary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION IN BUSINESS, 2014, 7 (02) : 86 - 107
  • [9] An exploratory study of the perceptions of AACSB International's 2013 Accreditation Standards
    Miles, Morgan P.
    Franklin, Geralyn McClure
    Grimmer, Martin
    Heriot, Kirl C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION IN BUSINESS, 2015, 8 (01) : 2 - 17
  • [10] AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns
    Romero, Eric J.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2008, 7 (02) : 245 - 255