Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective

被引:170
|
作者
Van Dijk, Dina [1 ]
Kluger, Avraham N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Hlth Syst Management, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Mt Scopus, Jerusalem Sch Business Adm, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
feedback; feedback sign; motivation; performance; regulatory focus; prevention and promotion foci; task type; IMPLICIT THEORIES; PREVENTION; PROMOTION; FIT; DECISION; INTERVENTIONS; COMPLEXITY; LEADERSHIP; STRENGTH; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/job.725
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Applying Higgins' regulatory focus theory, we hypothesized that the effect of positive/negative feedback on motivation and performance is moderated by task type, which is argued to be an antecedent to situational regulatory focus (promotion or prevention). Thus, first we demonstrated that some tasks (e.g., tasks requiring creativity) are perceived as promotion tasks, whereas others (e. g., those requiring vigilance and attention to detail) are perceived as prevention tasks. Second, as expected, our tests in two studies of the moderation hypothesis showed that positive feedback increased self-reported motivation (meta-analysis across samples: N = 315, d = 0.43) and actual performance (N = 55, d = 0.67) among people working on promotion tasks, relative to negative feedback. Positive feedback, however, decreased motivation (N = 318, d = -0.33) and performance (N = 55, d = -0.37) among individuals working on prevention tasks, relative to negative feedback. These findings suggest that (a) performance of different tasks can affect regulatory focus and (b) variability in positive/negative feedback effects can be partially explained by regulatory focus and task type. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1105
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physiological response to positive and negative feedback is moderated by regulatory focus
    Farb, N
    Cunningham, W
    Anderson, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 195 - 196
  • [2] EFFECTS OF THE INTERACTION OF FEEDBACK AND MOTIVATION ON TASK-PERFORMANCE
    FRENCH, EG
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1956, 11 (08) : 395 - 395
  • [3] Positive and negative supervisor developmental feedback and task-performance
    Zheng, Xingshan
    Diaz, Ismael
    Jing, Yin
    Chiaburu, Dan S.
    [J]. LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (02) : 212 - 232
  • [4] Positive feedback, feedback seeking and performance: Feedback orientation as a moderator
    Su, Weilin
    Jiang, Shangfeng
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 54 (01)
  • [5] The Effect of Positive and Negative Verbal Feedback on Surgical Skills Performance and Motivation
    Kannappan, Aarthy
    Yip, Dana T.
    Lodhia, Nayna A.
    Morton, John
    Lau, James N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 69 (06) : 798 - 801
  • [6] Different Effects of Supervisor Positive and Negative Feedback on Subordinate In-Role and Extra-Role Performance: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus
    Su, Weilin
    Yuan, Shuai
    Qi, Qian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [7] Positive or Negative? The Influence of Message Framing, Regulatory Focus, and Product Type
    Lee, Hsiao-Ching
    Liu, Shu-Fang
    Cheng, Ya-Chung
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2018, 12 : 788 - 805
  • [8] Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus?
    Van-Dijk, D
    Kluger, AN
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2004, 53 (01): : 113 - 135
  • [9] When positive and negative expectancies disrupt performance: Regulatory focus as a catalyst
    Keller, Johannes
    Bless, Herbert
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 38 (02) : 187 - 212
  • [10] On the positive and negative effects of self-efficacy on performance: Reward as a moderator
    Tzur, Keren Stirin
    Ganzach, Yoav
    Pazy, Asya
    [J]. HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2016, 29 (05) : 362 - 377