A New Decision Making Approach for Supplier Selection: Hesitant Fuzzy Axiomatic Design

被引:7
|
作者
Ayhan, Mustafa Batuhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Ind Engn Dept, MA 319,Gortepe Campus, Istanbul, TR, Turkey
关键词
Hesitant fuzzy axiomatic design; hesitant fuzzy AHP; supplier selection; multi-criteria decision making; sensitivity analysis; LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; CRITERIA; TOPSIS; MULTIPRODUCT; DISTANCE; MODEL; MULTIPERIOD; NETWORK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622018500189
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper deals with the hesitancy in decision making. Since the decision makers generally doubt to evaluate the alternatives and the criteria in hesitant situations, the existing methods do not satisfy them. Therefore, hesitant versions of Fuzzy-AHP (HF-AHP) and Fuzzy omatic Design (HF-AD) are introduced in this paper. HF-AHP lets the decision makers to use hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms while performing the pairwise comparisons when they are in-decisive. HF-AD is used to define the system and design ranges of the items in a hesitant situation. In addition, a case study is revealed as a numerical example in which the best supplier is selected among six alternatives regarding five criteria. In that case study, both weighted and unweighted versions of HF-AD are used. In the weighted version, HF-AHP is used to determine the weights of the criteria. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is performed to check the robustness of the decision. Moreover, these proposed techniques are compared with non-hesitant versions. According to the results, the decision makers feel more confident with the hesitant versions. Hence, the primary contributions of this study are to develop HF-AD and HF-AHP which are helpful for the decision makers to express their preferences in hesitant situations.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1117
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AXIOMATIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Gocer, Fethullah
    [J]. UNCERTAINTY MODELLING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 10 : 819 - 825
  • [2] Supplier selection with fuzzy axiomatic design
    Özel, Bedriye
    Özyörük, Bahar
    [J]. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 2007, 22 (03): : 415 - 423
  • [3] A Supplier Selection Decision-Making Approach for Complex Product Development Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Information
    Li, Baodong
    Su, Jiafu
    Yuan, Boqiao
    Li, Lvcheng
    Zhao, Yihuan
    Qin, Zhidan
    Qian, Li
    [J]. AXIOMS, 2023, 12 (11)
  • [4] A hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making approach based on TOPSIS for parts supplier selection
    Zhang, Junling
    Qi, Xiaowen
    Huang, Haibin
    [J]. ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, PTS 1-4, 2013, 357-360 : 2730 - +
  • [5] Dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making method and its application to supplier selection
    Dejian Yu
    Deng-Feng Li
    José M. Merigó
    [J]. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2016, 7 : 819 - 831
  • [6] Dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making method and its application to supplier selection
    Yu, Dejian
    Li, Deng-Feng
    Merigo, Jose M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2016, 7 (05) : 819 - 831
  • [8] Algorithms for multiple attribute decision making with dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy information and their application to supplier selection
    Li, Xu-Yang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2021, 25 (04) : 465 - 475
  • [9] A comparison between intuitionistic and hesitant fuzzy applied to supplier selection group decision-making problems
    Del Rosso Calache, Lucas Daniel
    Galo, Nadya Regina
    Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro
    [J]. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2021, 14 (03) : 231 - 273
  • [10] Application of a new combined intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM approach based on axiomatic design methodology for the supplier selection problem
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Gocer, Fethullah
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 52 : 1222 - 1238