Comparison of linear and nonlinear static and dynamic behaviour of prestressed and non-prestressed concrete slab elements

被引:0
|
作者
Mahowald, J. [1 ]
Bungard, V. [1 ]
Maas, S. [1 ]
Waldmann, D. [1 ]
Zuerbes, A. [1 ]
De Roeck, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Fac Sci Technol & Commun, Rue Richard Coudenhove Kalergi 6, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Div Struct Mech, Dept Civil Engn, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
DAMAGE; BEAM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Today, static load tests and vibration monitoring systems are very common in the context of condition control, respectively, damage assessment of civil engineering structures. Both methods share the property that static parameters, like vertical deflections, as well as dynamic characteristics, like the eigenfrequencies, are representative for the stiffness distribution of a structure. Thus, in this paper comparisons of changes in static and dynamic behaviour of a non-prestressed and a prestressed concrete slab during their lifetimes are presented in order to simulate bridge conditions in controlled environmental conditions. The aim of the experimental tests is to evaluate the accuracy of these tests for civil engineering structures. The measurements show that for the prestressed slab, the dynamical method as well as the static load tests, for distinct damage scenarios, yield different results compared to the non-prestressed slab. Moreover, one can recognise that the changes in static and dynamical parameters are more sensitive for the non-prestressed slab as for the prestressed slab.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 728
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behaviour of ambient cured prestressed and non-prestressed geopolymer concrete beams
    Sonal, Thakkar
    Urmil, Dave
    Darshan, Bhatol
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2022, 16
  • [2] Punching behaviour of column-slab connection strengthened with non-prestressed or prestressed FRP plates
    Abdullah, A.
    Bailey, C. G.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 160 : 229 - 242
  • [3] Deformation Forecast of Prestressed and Non-Prestressed Concrete Members
    Krueger, Wolfgang
    Mertzsch, Olaf
    Koch, Steffen
    BETON- UND STAHLBETONBAU, 2009, 104 (06) : 340 - 348
  • [4] SHEAR AND TORSION DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED AND NON-PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS
    GERGELY, P
    JOURNAL PRESTRESSED CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1981, 26 (06): : 98 - 99
  • [5] SHEAR AND TORSION DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED AND NON-PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS
    COLLINS, MP
    MITCHELL, D
    JOURNAL PRESTRESSED CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1980, 25 (05): : 32 - 100
  • [6] Pullout capacity of non-prestressed bent strands for prestressed concrete girders
    Noppakunwijai, P
    Jongpitakseel, N
    Ma, ZG
    Yehia, SA
    Tadros, MK
    PCI JOURNAL, 2002, 47 (04): : 90 - 103
  • [7] SHEAR AND TORSION DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED AND NON-PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM - CLOSURE
    COLLINS, MP
    MITCHELL, D
    JOURNAL PRESTRESSED CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1981, 26 (06): : 108 - 118
  • [8] Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete-Composite Beams with Prestressed Concrete and Non-Prestressed Concrete
    Kim, Chul-Goo
    Park, Hong-Gun
    Hong, Geon-Ho
    Lee, Hyerin
    Suh, Jung-Il
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2018, 115 (04) : 917 - 930
  • [9] Pullout capacity of non-prestressed bent strands for prestressed concrete girders - Comment
    McCrate, TE
    Noppakunwijai, P
    Jongpitakseel, N
    Ma, ZG
    Yehia, SA
    Tadros, MK
    PCI JOURNAL, 2003, 48 (04): : 144 - 145
  • [10] Research on Hysteretic Models for Prestressed and Non-Prestressed Steel Reinforced Concrete Frames
    Luo, Huihui
    Wang, Kun
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021