Trade-offs between energy-environmental-economic objectives for China's power decarbonization policies

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Ying [1 ]
Lukszo, Zofia [1 ]
Weijnen, Margot [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Facluty Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
decarbonization; power sector; policies; China; RENEWABLE ENERGY; WIND POWER; CARBON; PRICE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This study investigates the energy implications of various pathways of China's power decarbonization in terms of RES power penetration and coal consumption. It complements our previous work in [1] which stressed the economic effectiveness and CO2 emission reductions. Based on the results of these two works, here we analyze the trade-offs of the energy-environmental-economic (3E) objectives of the pathways. We find that although CCS technology can help achieve a cost effective and a high degree of CO2 emission abatement, it results in an additional coal consumption and cost disadvantages of RES power. Accordingly, if China heavily relies on CCS technology to achieve power decarbonization, the long-term energy sustainability is undermined. The challenges for policy makers are therefore to design comprehensive packages which are mutually reinforcing or at least compatible with acceptable costs in achieving the 3E objectives for the power decarbonization. With an empirical review of the past policy designs, we also find that China favors energy sustainability, yet neglecting the economic effectiveness and CO2 emissions. The institutional environment including the government's attitudes towards climate change, the development of ETS market and the reforms on electricity price, will largely influence the deployment of low-carbon technologies and thus the pathways of power decarbonization.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MEDIATING ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY, AND ECONOMIC TRADE-OFFS
    STRAUS, DB
    [J]. ARBITRATION JOURNAL, 1977, 32 (02): : 96 - 110
  • [2] Electric vehicle charging in China's power system: Energy, economic and environmental trade-offs and policy implications
    Li, Ying
    Davis, Chris
    Lukszo, Zofia
    Weijnen, Margot
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 173 : 535 - 554
  • [3] Fisheries management scenarios: trade-offs between economic and biological objectives
    Maravelias, C. D.
    Pantazi, M.
    Maynou, F.
    [J]. FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 186 - 195
  • [4] Quantification of environmental-economic trade-offs in nutrient management policies
    Kaye-Blake, William
    Schilling, Chris
    Monaghan, Ross
    Vibart, Ronaldo
    Dennis, Samuel
    Post, Elizabeth
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 173 : 458 - 468
  • [5] Trade-offs in energy and environmental policy
    Teresa Costa-Campi, Maria
    del Rio, Pablo
    Trujillo-Baute, Elisa
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 104 : 415 - 418
  • [6] The Effectiveness and Trade-Offs of Renewable Energy Policies in Achieving the Dual Decarbonization Goals in China: A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Analysis
    Wei, Wei
    He, Ling
    Li, Xiaofan
    Cui, Qi
    Chen, Hao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [7] Trade-offs between objectives for ecosystem management of fisheries
    Andersen, Ken H.
    Brander, Keith
    Ravn-Jonsen, Lars
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 25 (05) : 1390 - 1396
  • [8] Trade-offs between economic benefits and environmental impacts of vegetable greenhouses expansion in East China
    Qiu, Lefeng
    Wu, Shaohua
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (40) : 56257 - 56268
  • [9] Trade-offs between economic benefits and environmental impacts of vegetable greenhouses expansion in East China
    Lefeng Qiu
    Shaohua Wu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 56257 - 56268
  • [10] Trade-offs between macroeconomic and financial stability objectives
    Fouejieu, Armand
    Popescu, Alexandra
    Villieu, Patrick
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2019, 81 : 621 - 639