Conceptualisation of Organisational Ethics: A Multi-Level Meso Approach

被引:1
|
作者
Grobler, Anton [1 ]
Grobler, Sonja [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Africa, Grad Sch Business Leadership, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ South Africa, Ind & Org Psychol Dept, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Organisational ethics; social learning theory; social exchange theory; multilevel thinking; general systems theory; micro-meso-macro levels of analysis; MICRO;
D O I
10.2143/EP.25.4.3285712
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this article was firstly to conceptualise Organisational Ethics (OE) in terms of its multi-dimensionality, adopting the General Systems Theory (GST), Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) and the micro-mesomacro framework as foundation. The dimensionality of OE was assessed through the validation of an OE measurement model which was based on the Organisational Ethics Indicator (0EI1) a section of the African Business Ethics Survey. The multi-dimensionality of OE was statistically explored and confirmed through a multi-factorial model, that yielded a reliable and valid five-factor solution. The five components were interpreted in accordance of their respective hierarchical level within the micro-meso-macro framework. The macro components were labelled ethical organisational climate and ethical inclination of the organisation; the meso components were labelled ethical leadership and decision-making as well as politics, policies and procedures, while the micro component was ethical work values and attitudes of employees. The interrelatedness and mutual dependencies of these components of OE were determined and explained through the social learning and social exchange theories. The contribution of this study lies in a validated conceptualisation and measurement model of OE, to be used by business leaders and ethics practitioners to enhance ethical conduct in organisations.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 751
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Method in computer ethics: Towards a multi-level interdisciplinary approach
    Brey P.
    [J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2000, 2 (2) : 125 - 129
  • [2] Organisational interfaces, risk potentials and quality losses in nursing:: A multi-level approach
    Büssing, A
    Glaser, J
    Herbig, B
    [J]. SAFETY IN MEDICINE, 2000, : 155 - 174
  • [3] HRM and innovation: a multi-level organisational learning perspective
    Lin, Cai-Hui
    Sanders, Karin
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 27 (02) : 300 - 317
  • [4] Stakeholder conceptualisation of multi-level HIV and AIDS determinants in a Black epicentre
    Brawner, Bridgette M.
    Reason, Janaiya L.
    Hanlon, Kelsey
    Guthrie, Barbara
    Schensul, Jean J.
    [J]. CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY, 2017, 19 (09) : 948 - 963
  • [5] Psychology and Business Ethics: A Multi-level Research Agenda
    Gazi Islam
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, 165 : 1 - 13
  • [6] Psychology and Business Ethics: A Multi-level Research Agenda
    Islam, Gazi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 165 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [7] A multi-level approach for document clustering
    Oliveira, S
    Seok, SC
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2005, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3514 : 204 - 211
  • [8] Defining Species: A Multi-Level Approach
    Baetu, Tudor M.
    [J]. ACTA BIOTHEORETICA, 2012, 60 (03) : 239 - 255
  • [9] A Multi-Level Approach to Interoception and Psychopathology
    Khalsa, Sahib
    Puhl, Maria
    Yeh, Hung-wen
    Kuplicki, Rayus
    Forthman, Katie
    Feinstein, Justin
    Victor, Teresa
    Paulus, Martin
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 43 : S431 - S431
  • [10] A multi-level approach to sensor management
    Strömberg, D
    [J]. SENSOR FUSION: ARCHITECTURES, ALGORITHMS, AND APPLICATIONS IV, 2000, 4051 : 456 - 461