Consumer Stock Ownership Plans (CSOPs)-The Prototype Business Model for Renewable Energy Communities

被引:26
|
作者
Lowitzsch, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Europa Univ Viadrina, Comparat Law, East European Business Law & European Legal Polic, Fac Business Adm & Econ, Grosse Scharrnstr 59, D-15230 Frankfurt, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Renewable energy communities; renewable energy directive; prosumership; decentralised energy production; energy clusters; European Union; consumer (co-)ownership; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.3390/en13010118
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The 2018 recast of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) defines "renewable energy communities" (RECs), introducing a new governance model and the possibility of energy sharing for them. It has to be transposed into national law by all European Union Member States until June 2021. This article introduces consumer stock ownership plans (CSOPs) as the prototype business model for RECs. Based on the analysis of a dataset of 67 best-practice cases of consumer (co-) ownership from 18 countries it demonstrates the importance of flexibility of business models to include heterogeneous co-investors for meeting the requirements of the RED II and that of RE clusters. It is shown that CSOPs-designed to facilitate scalable investments in utilities-facilitate co-investments by municipalities, SMEs, plant engineers or energy suppliers. A low-threshold financing method, they enable individuals, in particular low-income households, to invest in renewable projects. Employing one bank loan instead of many micro loans, CSOPs reduce transaction costs and enable consumers to acquire productive capital, providing them with an additional source of income. Stressing the importance of a holistic approach including the governance and the technical side for the acceptance of RECs on the energy markets recommendations for the transposition are formulated.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consumer ownership, natural monopolies and transition to 100% renewable energy systems
    Hvelplund, Frede
    Djorup, Soren
    ENERGY, 2019, 181 : 440 - 449
  • [2] Diffusion of innovation model of consumer behaviour - Ideas to accelerate adoption of renewable energy sources by consumer communities in India
    Mani, Swaminathan
    Dhingra, Tarun
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 39 (01) : 162 - 165
  • [3] Renewable energy communities: Do they have a business case in Flanders?
    Felice, Alex
    Rakocevic, Lucija
    Peeters, Leen
    Messagie, Maarten
    Coosemans, Thierry
    Camargo, Luis Ramirez
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 322
  • [4] Renewable energy communities: Do they have a business case in Flanders?
    Felice, Alex
    Rakocevic, Lucija
    Peeters, Leen
    Messagie, Maarten
    Coosemans, Thierry
    Camargo, Luis Ramirez
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 322
  • [5] The role of equity balance and executive stock ownership in the innovation efficiency of renewable energy enterprises
    Xu, Xin Long
    Chen, Hsing Hung
    Li, Yi
    Chen, Qi Xia
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [6] Renewable Energy Communities business models under the 2020 Italian regulation
    Cielo, A.
    Margiaria, P.
    Lazzeroni, P.
    Mariuzzo, I.
    Repetto, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 316
  • [7] Rights and ownership in sea country: implications of marine renewable energy for indigenous and local communities
    Kerr, Sandy
    Colton, John
    Johnson, Kate
    Wright, Glen
    MARINE POLICY, 2015, 52 : 108 - 115
  • [8] A business environment analysis model for renewable solar energy
    Massihi, N.
    Abdolvand, N.
    Harandi, S. Rajaee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 18 (02) : 401 - 416
  • [9] A business environment analysis model for renewable solar energy
    N. Massihi
    N. Abdolvand
    S. Rajaee Harandi
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2021, 18 : 401 - 416
  • [10] Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy
    Richter, Mario
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 1226 - 1237