Crack width verification and minimum reinforcement according to Eurocode 2-current model versus new proposal for revision

被引:2
|
作者
Nguyen Viet Tue [1 ]
Fehling, Ekkehard [2 ]
Schlicke, Dirk [1 ]
Krenn, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Betonbau, Lessingstr 25-1, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Kassel, Fachgebiet Massivbau, Kurt Wolters Str 3, D-34109 Kassel, Germany
关键词
crack width calculation; crack width limitation; minimum reinforcement; prestressed articulated cross-section; thick member; mechanical model; empirical factors; EC2; Eurocode; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1002/best.202100038
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Crack width verification and minimum reinforcement according to Eurocode 2 - current model versus new proposal for revision Limiting crack widths to an acceptable level and determining the required minimum reinforcement are important tasks in the design of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures. Experience with different types of structures from watertight concrete structures to prestressed concrete bridges shows that the concept currently applied in Germany and Austria is very effective and that significant changes are not necessary. The current draft for the revision of EC2, however, presents a new concept for crack width verification and minimum reinforcement. In contrast to the concept currently used in Germany and Austria, this new concept is based more on the analysis and good reproduction of the observations made in laboratory experiments and takes less account of the mechanical relationships of reinforced or prestressed concrete after cracking. For this purpose, numerous empirical factors are introduced, which not only complicate the understanding but also the application in practice. However, an improvement in the accuracy of the crack width prediction is not achieved and the minimum reinforcement is significantly underestimated, especially for prestressed cross-sections and thick members. In this paper, the new concept in EC2 is explained in detail. Its main weaknesses and contradictions are discussed by a comparison with the concept currently applied in Germany and Austria as well as detailed analysis of 2D FEM simulations with discrete cracks and adequate regard of the bond stress-slip relationship at the reinforcement-concrete interface. This should provide the basis for a factual discussion before the introduction of the new EC2.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 858
页数:22
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Crack width verification and minimum reinforcement according to EC 2: Current model with specifications in Germany and Austria vs proposal for revision
    Tue, Nguyen Viet
    Fehling, Ekkehard
    Schlicke, Dirk
    Krenn, Christina
    [J]. Civil Engineering Design, 2021, 3 (5-6) : 210 - 228
  • [2] Evaluation of Current Crack Width Calculation Methods According to Eurocode 2 and fib Model Code 2010
    Tan, Reignard
    Hendriks, Max A. N.
    Kanstad, Terje
    [J]. HIGH TECH CONCRETE: WHERE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING MEET, 2018, : 1610 - 1618
  • [3] Minimum Reinforcement for Limiting Crack Width under Consideration of the real Member Behaviour Part 2: Application for Walls on Foundations and Demarcation to Crack Force Detection according to EC2
    Schlicke, Dirk
    Nguyen Viet Tue
    [J]. BETON- UND STAHLBETONBAU, 2016, 111 (04) : 210 - 220
  • [4] Minimum Reinforcement on Limit Crack width in Reinforced Concrete Structures due to the Hydration Part 2: New Approaches Based on the Deformation Compatibility
    Boedefeld, Joerg
    Ehmann, Rainer
    Schlicke, Dirk
    Nguyen Viet Tue
    [J]. BETON- UND STAHLBETONBAU, 2012, 107 (02) : 79 - 85