Differential Relationships of Guilt and Shame on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Veterans

Objective: Despite important conceptual differences between shame and guilt, literature distinguishing these emotions in relation to posttrauma functioning for veterans has been largely theoretical. This is the first study to concurrently examine trauma-related guilt and internalized shame in relation to PTSD severity as the dependent variable. Our primary aim was to examine guilt and shame on PTSD symptom severity within the same model. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether trauma-related guilt can occur independent of shame. Method: Participants were 144 veterans seeking PTSD treatment. Regression analysis was used for our primary aim. Chi-square was used for our secondary aim to examine the percentage of participants categorized one standard deviation above (high) and below (low) the mean for shame and guilt. Results: Entered together, internalized shame (beta = .44, p < .001) and guilt-related distress (beta = .32, p < .001) were related to PTSD severity. Guilt cognitions and global guilt were unrelated to PTSD. Analyses showed significant differences in participants categorized as low/high shame and low/high global guilt (chi(2) = 14.22, p < .001), guilt-related distress (chi(2) = 15.09, p < .001), and guilt cognitions (chi(2) = 13.16, p < .001). Across guilt subscales, "shame-free" trauma-related guilt did not exist (0%). Conclusions Internalized shame and guilt distress were both related to PTSD severity; however, shame added variance not already accounted for by guilt. Tangney, Stuewig, and Mashek (2007) stipulate that guilt becomes maladaptive when fused with shame; however, our results indicate trauma-related guilt is possibly always fused with shame.