Comparison Neural Network and Support Vector Machine for Production Quantity Prediction

被引:2
|
作者
Dzakiyullah, Nur Rachman [1 ]
Hussin, Burairah [1 ]
Saleh, Chairul [2 ]
Handani, Aditian Maytri [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tekn Malaysia Melaka UTeM, Fac Informat Technol & Commun, Melaka, Malaysia
[2] Islamic Univ Indonesia, Dept Ind Engn, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Neural Network; Support Vector Machines; Prediction; RMSE; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; YIELD; MODEL;
D O I
10.1166/asl.2014.5708
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This research presents the comparison of Neural Network (NN) model and Support Vector Machine (SVM) for predicting production quantity. The experiment is performed by optimizing the parameter of NN model and SVM by trial and error to find the smallest error between actual and predicted. The private data set (foundry manufacturing) has been collected from 2006 until 2013 that used for testing such both models. This data set is split into training data and testing data using a cross-validation method for training and testing phase. The result shows that the NN model is better than SVM by having the smallest RMSE of the NN model was 1.713, meanwhile SVM was 1.718 on the training phase. After used in testing phase, can obtain RMSE of the NN model was 0.206284249 and for SVM 0.309426374. Finally, this comparison provides contribution to knowledge where NN makes impressive performance then SVM for production quantity prediction
引用
收藏
页码:2129 / 2133
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PREDICTION OF WATER CONDUITS FAILURE RATE - COMPARISON OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE AND NEURAL NETWORK
    Kutylowska, Malgorzata
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND ENGINEERING A-CHEMIA I INZYNIERIA EKOLOGICZNA A, 2016, 23 (02): : 147 - 160
  • [2] Comparison of GARCH, Neural Network and Support Vector Machine in Financial Time Series Prediction
    Hossain, Altaf
    Zaman, Faisal
    Nasser, M.
    Islam, M. Mufakhkharul
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5909 : 597 - +
  • [3] Software Defect Prediction: A Comparison Between Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine
    Arora, Ishani
    Saha, Anju
    [J]. ADVANCED COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 562 : 51 - 61
  • [4] Displacement Prediction of Tunnel Surrounding Rock: A Comparison of Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network
    Wu, Qingdong
    Yan, Bo
    Zhang, Chao
    Wang, Lu
    Ning, Guobao
    Yu, B.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 2014
  • [5] Approximating support vector machine with artificial neural network for fast prediction
    Kang, Seokho
    Cho, Sungzoon
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (10) : 4989 - 4995
  • [6] Disruption Prediction by Support Vector Machine and Neural Network with Exhaustive Search
    Yokoyama, Tatsuya
    Sueyoshi, Takamitsu
    Miyoshi, Yuya
    Hiwatari, Ryoji
    Igarashi, Yasuhiko
    Okada, Masato
    Ogawa, Yuichi
    [J]. PLASMA AND FUSION RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [7] Crop Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine
    Fegade, Tanuja K.
    Pawar, B. V.
    [J]. DATA MANAGEMENT, ANALYTICS AND INNOVATION, ICDMAI 2019, VOL 2, 2020, 1016 : 311 - 324
  • [8] Comparison of Artificial Neural Network, Linear Regression and Support Vector Machine for Prediction of Solar PV Power
    Kuriakose, Ans Maria
    Kariyalil, Denny Philip
    Augusthy, Marymol
    Sarath, S.
    Jacob, Joffie
    Antony, Neenu Rose
    [J]. 2020 IEEE PUNE SECTION INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (PUNECON), 2020, : 53 - 58
  • [9] Comparison of neural network and support vector machine methods for Kp forecasting
    Ji, Eun-Young
    Moon, Y. -J.
    Park, Jongyeob
    Lee, Jin-Yi
    Lee, D. -H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2013, 118 (08) : 5109 - 5117
  • [10] Prediction of circulating water loss based on support vector machine and neural network
    Yin, Aiming
    Cao, Fan
    Jin, Xuliang
    Dong, Lei
    Nie, Jinfeng
    Ma, Lin
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2020, 467