Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:154
|
作者
Jalota, Leena [1 ]
Kalira, Vicki [1 ,2 ]
George, Elizabeth [1 ]
Shi, Yung-Ying [1 ]
Hornuss, Cyrill [1 ]
Radke, Oliver [1 ,3 ]
Pace, Nathan L. [1 ,4 ]
Apfel, Christian C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Care, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] W Virginia Sch Med, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Dresden, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care Med, Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Anaesthesiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
关键词
LONG-CHAIN TRIGLYCERIDE; IONTOPHORETICALLY APPLIED LIDOCAINE; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; ADULT SURGICAL-PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; VENOUS OCCLUSION; REDUCES PAIN; FLURBIPROFEN AXETIL; INTRAVENOUS-INJECTION; NITROUS-OXIDE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.d1110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To systematically determine the most efficacious approach for preventing pain on injection of propofol. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, www.clinicaltrials.gov, and hand searching from the reference lists of identified papers. Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing drug and non-drug interventions with placebo or another intervention to alleviate pain on injection of propofol in adults. Results Data were analysed from 177 randomised controlled trials totalling 25 260 adults. The overall risk of pain from propofol injection alone was about 60%. Using an antecubital vein instead of a hand vein was the most effective single intervention (relative risk 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.30). Pretreatment using lidocaine (lignocaine) in conjunction with venous occlusion was similarly effective (0.29, 0.22 to 0.38). Other effective interventions were a lidocaine-propofol admixture (0.40, 0.33 to 0.48); pretreatment with lidocaine (0.47, 0.40 to 0.56), opioids (0.49, 0.41 to 0.59), ketamine (0.52, 0.46 to 0.57), or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (0.67, 0.49 to 0.91); and propofol emulsions containing medium and long chain triglycerides (0.75, 0.67 to 0.84). Statistical testing of indirect comparisons showed that use of the antecubital vein and pretreatment using lidocaine along with venous occlusion to be more efficacious than the other interventions. Conclusions The two most efficacious interventions to reduce pain on injection of propofol were use of the antecubital vein, or pretreatment using lidocaine in conjunction with venous occlusion when the hand vein was chosen. Under the assumption of independent efficacy a third practical alternative could be pretreatment of the hand vein with lidocaine or ketamine and use of a propofol emulsion containing medium and long chain triglycerides. Although not the most effective intervention on its own, a small dose of opioids before induction halved the risk of pain from the injection and thus can generally be recommended unless contraindicated.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of flurbiprofen axetil in the prevention of pain on propofol injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Lieliang
    Zhu, Juan
    Xu, Lei
    Zhang, Xunlei
    Wang, Hongyu
    Luo, Zhonghua
    Zhao, Yamei
    Yu, Yi
    Zhang, Yong
    Shi, Hongwei
    Bao, Hongguang
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2014, 20 : 995 - 1002
  • [2] Pharmacological control of pain during propofol injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bakhtiari, Elham
    Mousavi, Seyed Hadi
    Gharavi Fard, Mohammad
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 14 (07) : 889 - 899
  • [3] Efficacy of ondansetron for the prevention of propofol injection pain: a meta-analysis
    Pei, Shenglin
    Zhou, Chengmao
    Zhu, Yu
    Huang, Bing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 10 : 445 - 450
  • [4] Effects of dezocine on prevention of propofol injection pain: a meta-analysis
    Zhou, Chengmao
    Yang, Yuting
    Zhu, Yu
    Ruan, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 10 : 1369 - 1375
  • [5] Prevention of pain on injection with propofol:: A quantitative systematic review
    Picard, P
    Tramèr, MR
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (04): : 963 - 969
  • [6] Dexmedetomidine for prevention of propofol injection pain upon induction of anesthesia: a meta-analysis
    Liting Ji
    Weihua Sun
    Yunping Lan
    Changxing Xia
    Gongmin Yu
    Qinghua Wu
    Shufen Yang
    Xiaofeng Xu
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2020, 76 : 1103 - 1110
  • [7] Dexmedetomidine for prevention of propofol injection pain upon induction of anesthesia: a meta-analysis
    Ji, Liting
    Sun, Weihua
    Lan, Yunping
    Xia, Changxing
    Yu, Gongmin
    Wu, Qinghua
    Yang, Shufen
    Xu, Xiaofeng
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 76 (08) : 1103 - 1110
  • [8] Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection
    Habre, Celine
    Tramer, Martin R.
    Poepping, Daniel M.
    Elia, Nadia
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 349
  • [9] Prevention of Low Back Pain A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Steffens, Daniel
    Maher, Chris G.
    Pereira, Leani S. M.
    Stevens, Matthew L.
    Oliveira, Vinicius C.
    Chapple, Meredith
    Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F.
    Hancock, Mark J.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (02) : 199 - 208
  • [10] Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    d'Azy, Cedric Benoist
    Pereira, Bruno
    Naughton, Geraldine
    Chiambaretta, Frederic
    Dutheil, Frederic
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):