Effect of Bottom Friction, Wind Drag Coefficient, and Meteorological Forcing in Hindcast of Hurricane Rita Storm Surge Using SWAN

被引:29
|
作者
Akbar, Muhammad K. [1 ]
Kanjanda, Simbarashe [1 ]
Musinguzi, Abram [2 ]
机构
[1] Tennessee State Univ, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Nashville, TN 37209 USA
[2] Tennessee State Univ, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Nashville, TN 37209 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
hurricane storm surge; bottom friction; drag coefficient formulation; wind model; circulation and wave coupled model; hurricane vortex pattern; SEA-SURFACE; REAL-TIME; MODEL; SYSTEM; FIELDS; OCEAN; PREDICTION; PROFILES; COASTAL; STRESS;
D O I
10.3390/jmse5030038
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
An evaluation of the effect of bottom friction, wind drag coefficient, and meteorological forcing is conducted using a tightly coupled wave and circulation model, SWAN + ADCIRC (i.e., Simulating WAves Nearshore + ADvanced CIRCulation), to hindcast the storm surge of Hurricane Rita (2005). Wind drag coefficient formulations of Powell, Zijlema, and Peng & Li are used to calculate wind stresses. Bottom friction and wind drag coefficients are systematically increased and decreased to quantify their impacts on the hindcast. Different meteorological forcing options are applied to study the effect of wind fields on storm surge development and propagation. Simulated water levels are compared with observed data collected from about 150 locations. It is evident that a lower bottom friction causes higher and faster surge propagation, and earlier arrival of inundation peak at locations far from the land fall. Drag coefficients of Powell, with or without a cap of 0.002, and Zijlema produce similar results, while that of Peng & Li slightly overpredicted the surge. Wind fields may cause overprediction or underprediction of the surge, depending on the choice of the wind model. A good agreement is found between Zijlema's findings and this study; that simultaneously decreasing or increasing both bottom friction and wind drag essentially provides the same hindcast results.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Sensitivities of modelling storm surge to bottom friction, wind drag coefficient, and meteorological product in the East China Sea
    Chu, Dongdong
    Zhang, Jicai
    Wu, Yongsheng
    Jiao, Xiaohui
    Qian, Suhui
    [J]. ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2019, 231
  • [2] Adjusting the Wind Stress Drag Coefficient in Storm Surge Forecasting Using an Adjoint Technique
    Peng, Shiqiu
    Li, Yineng
    Xie, Lian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 30 (03) : 590 - 608
  • [3] Using Wind Setdown and Storm Surge on Lake Erie to Calibrate the Air-Sea Drag Coefficient
    Drews, Carl
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [4] Understanding Hurricane Storm Surge Generation and Propagation Using a Forecasting Model, Forecast Advisories and Best Track in a Wind Model, and Observed Data-Case Study Hurricane Rita
    Musinguzi, Abram
    Akbar, Muhammad K.
    Fleming, Jason G.
    Hargrove, Samuel K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (03)