Factors Determining Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Versus Retropubic

被引:108
|
作者
Kim, Seong Cheol [3 ]
Song, Cheryn [1 ]
Kim, Wansuk [1 ]
Kang, Taejin [1 ]
Park, Jinsung [4 ]
Jeong, In Gab [1 ]
Lee, Sangmi [1 ]
Cho, Yong Mee [2 ]
Ahn, Hanjong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Dept Urol, Pusan, South Korea
[4] Eulji Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Taejon, South Korea
关键词
Robotics; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; URINARY CONTINENCE; RECOVERY; TESTOSTERONE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Early studies reported comparative results of functional outcomes between robot-assisted (RARP) and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). However, well-controlled single-surgeon prospective studies comparing the outcomes are rare. Objective: To compare functional outcomes after RARP and RRP performed by a single surgeon, and to identify factors predictive of early return of continence and potency. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 763 consecutive patients undergoing RP between 2007 and 2010 were prospectively included and serially followed postoperatively for comparative analysis. Intervention: RARP was performed in 528 patients, and 235 underwent RRP. Measurements: Continence was defined as being completely pad free. Potency was defined as having erection sufficient for intercourse with or without a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Continence and potency recovery were checked serially by interview and questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 mo postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards method analyses was performed to determine predictive factors for early recovery. Results and limitations: After the initial 132 cases, patients who underwent RARP demonstrated faster recovery of urinary continence compared to RRP patients. Potency recovery was more rapid in the RARP group at all evaluation time points, beginning from the initial cases. In multivariate analysis, younger age and longer preoperative membranous urethral length seen by prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated statistical significance as independent prognostic factors for continence recovery; younger age, surgical method (RARP vs RRP), and higher preoperative serum testosterone were independent prognostic factors for potency recovery. The limitations of the present study were that it was nonrandomized and used interview to evaluate potency recovery. Conclusions: Patients after RARP demonstrated superior functional recovery. Moreover, membranous urethral length on preoperative MRI and patient age were factors independently predictive of continence recovery, while patient age and higher preoperative serum testosterone were independent prognostic factors for potency recovery. (C) 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 419
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Factors Determining Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Versus Retropubic
    Peyromaure, Michael
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (01) : 220 - 221
  • [2] FACTORS INFLUENCING FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT-ASSISTED VERSUS RETROPUBIC
    Kim, S. C.
    Kim, W.
    Kim, J.
    Song, C.
    Hong, J. H.
    Kim, C. S.
    Ahn, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 311 - 311
  • [3] Impact of Prostate Volume on Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Open Retropubic
    Choo, Min Soo
    Choi, Woo Suk
    Cho, Sung Yong
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Kwak, Cheol
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 54 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [4] Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis
    Shi, Ming-Jun
    Yang, Jie
    Meng, Xiang-Yu
    Li, Sheng
    Liu, Tao
    Fang, Zhi-Hai
    Cao, Rui
    Wang, Xing-Huan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF META-ANALYSIS, 2014, 2 (03) : 107 - 126
  • [5] Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis
    Ming-Jun Shi
    Jie Yang
    Xiang-Yu Meng
    Sheng Li
    Tao Liu
    Zhi-Hai Fang
    Rui Cao
    Xing-Huan Wang
    [J]. World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2014, 2 (03) : 107 - 126
  • [6] COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE SURGEON EXPERIENCE
    Kang, T.
    Park, J.
    Song, C.
    Hong, J.
    Park, H.
    Ahn, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A112 - A112
  • [7] Comparison of oncological results and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy techniques retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted
    Prilepskaya, E. A.
    Maltsev, E. G.
    Kolontarev, K. B.
    Govorov, A. V.
    Rasner, P. I.
    Vasilyev, A. O.
    Sadchenko, A. V.
    Dyakov, V. V.
    Pushkar, D. U.
    [J]. ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2015, 11 (04): : 54 - 58
  • [8] Oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Drouin, S. -J.
    Vaessen, C.
    Misrai, V.
    Ferhi, K.
    Bitker, M. -O.
    Chartier-Kastler, E.
    Haertig, A.
    Richard, F.
    Roupret, M.
    [J]. PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 (03): : 158 - 164
  • [9] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    De Carlo, Francesco
    Celestino, Francesco
    Verri, Cristian
    Masedu, Francesco
    Liberati, Emanuele
    Di Stasi, Savino Mauro
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 93 (04) : 373 - 383
  • [10] Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Functional and Oncological Outcomes, A Single-Center Experience
    Ibis, Muhammed Arif
    Akpinar, Cagri
    Kubilay, Eralp
    Baltaci, Sumer
    Turkolmez, Kadir
    Suer, Evren
    [J]. UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 (03): : 153 - 157