Making monitoring 'work': human-machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia

被引:39
|
作者
Smith, AF [1 ]
Mort, M
Goodwin, D
Pope, C
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Anaesthesia, Lancaster LA1 4YT, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Inst Hlth Res, Lancaster LA1 4YT, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
关键词
monitoring; electronic; anaesthesia; education; professional expertise; technology; qualitative methods; patient safety;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03404.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This study aimed to explore the use of electronic monitoring within the context of anaesthetic practice. We conducted workplace observation of, and interviews with, anaesthetists and other anaesthetic staff in two UK hospitals. Transcripts were analysed inductively for recurrent themes. Whilst formal sources of knowledge in anaesthesia deal with the issue of monitoring in terms of theoretical principles and performance specifications of devices, anaesthetists in practice often 'disbelieve' monitoring information. They call on and integrate other sources of knowledge about the patient, especially from their clinical assessment. The ability to distinguish 'normal' and 'abnormal' findings is vital. Confidence in electronic information varies with experience, as does the degree to which electronic information may be considered 'redundant'. We conclude that electronic monitoring brings new dimensions of understanding but also the potential for new ways of misunderstanding. The tacit knowledge underlying the safe use of monitoring deserves greater acknowledgement in training and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1070 / 1078
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scoping Review on Human-Machine Interaction and Health and Safety at Work
    Robelski, Swantje
    Wischniewski, Sascha
    [J]. HCI IN BUSINESS, GOVERNMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS, HCIBGO 2016, PT II, 2016, 9752 : 337 - 347
  • [2] Cognitive Work Protection-A New Approach for Occupational Safety in Human-Machine Interaction
    Neu, Christian
    Kirchner, Elsa Andrea
    Kim, Su-Kyoung
    Tabie, Marc
    Linn, Christian
    Werth, Dirk
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND NEUROSCIENCE (NEUROIS RETREAT 2018), 2019, 29 : 211 - 220
  • [3] From human-machine interaction to human-machine cooperation
    Hoc, JM
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2000, 43 (07) : 833 - 843
  • [4] Safety Risk Assessment of Human-machine Interaction Behavior in Cockpit
    Zhang Yanjun
    Sun Youchao
    [J]. 2014 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGN (ISCID 2014), VOL 1, 2014, : 39 - 42
  • [5] Informational Human-Machine Interaction
    Al-Fedaghi, Sabah
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), VOLS 1-6, 2008, : 396 - 403
  • [6] Biometrics in Human-Machine Interaction
    Shier, W. A.
    Yanushkevich, S. N.
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES (IDT), 2015, : 305 - 313
  • [7] Visual human-machine interaction
    Zelinsky, A
    [J]. ADVANCED TOPICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1999, 1747 : 440 - 452
  • [8] Hazards in human-machine interaction
    Spatz, Johannes
    Langstrof, Alexandra
    [J]. Technische Sicherheit, 2024, 14 (9-10): : 15 - 18
  • [9] New approach to safety oriented system in human-machine cooperative work
    Arai, F
    Kawaji, A
    Fukuda, T
    Matsuura, H
    Ota, H
    [J]. 1998 JAPAN-U.S.A. SYMPOSIUM ON FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION - PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I AND II, 1998, : 51 - 58
  • [10] Human-Machine task allocation: Impact on patient safety in hospital settings
    Pelayo, S.
    Marcilly, R.
    Anceaux, F.
    Bernonville, S.
    Beuscart-Zephir, M. -C.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIE FRANCAISE, 2015, 60 (02): : 97 - 110