Instruments Measuring Spirituality in Clinical Research: A Systematic Review

被引:185
|
作者
Monod, Stefanie [1 ]
Brennan, Mark [2 ]
Rochat, Etienne Theologian [1 ]
Martin, Estelle [1 ]
Rochat, Stephane [1 ]
Buela, Christophe J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Med Ctr, Serv Geriatr Med & Geriatr Rehabil, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
[2] NYU, Coll Nursing, AIDS Community Res Initiat Amer ACRIA, ACRIA Ctr HIV & Aging, New York, NY USA
关键词
spirituality; spiritual assessment; spiritual intervention; spiritual well-being; spiritual needs; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TERMINALLY-ILL PATIENTS; ROYAL FREE INTERVIEW; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; PALLIATIVE CARE; SCALE; HEALTH; RELIGION; CANCER; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-011-1769-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Numerous instruments have been developed to assess spirituality and measure its association with health outcomes. This study's aims were to identify instruments used in clinical research that measure spirituality; to propose a classification of these instruments; and to identify those instruments that could provide information on the need for spiritual intervention. A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, CINHAL, PsycINFO, ATLA, and EMBASE databases, using the terms "spirituality" and "adult$," and limited to journal articles was performed to identify clinical studies that used a spiritual assessment instrument. For each instrument identified, measured constructs, intended goals, and data on psychometric properties were retrieved. A conceptual and a functional classification of instruments were developed. Thirty-five instruments were retrieved and classified into measures of general spirituality (N = 22), spiritual well-being (N = 5), spiritual coping (N = 4), and spiritual needs (N = 4) according to the conceptual classification. Instruments most frequently used in clinical research were the FACIT-Sp and the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Data on psychometric properties were mostly limited to content validity and inter-item reliability. According to the functional classification, 16 instruments were identified that included at least one item measuring a current spiritual state, but only three of those appeared suitable to address the need for spiritual intervention. Instruments identified in this systematic review assess multiple dimensions of spirituality, and the proposed classifications should help clinical researchers interested in investigating the complex relationship between spirituality and health. Findings underscore the scarcity of instruments specifically designed to measure a patient's current spiritual state. Moreover, the relatively limited data available on psychometric properties of these instruments highlight the need for additional research to determine whether they are suitable in identifying the need for spiritual interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1345 / 1357
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Instruments Measuring Spirituality in Clinical Research: A Systematic Review
    Stéfanie Monod
    Mark Brennan
    Etienne Rochat
    Estelle Martin
    Stéphane Rochat
    Christophe J. Büla
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2011, 26 : 1345 - 1357
  • [2] Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
    Lucchetti, Giancarlo
    Granero Lucchetti, Alessandra Lamas
    Vallada, Homero
    [J]. SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 131 (02): : 112 - 122
  • [3] Spirituality Assessment in Clinical Research: A Systematic Review of Instruments
    Monod, S.
    Rochat, E.
    Brennan, M.
    Rochat, S.
    Bula, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2009, 57 : S34 - S34
  • [4] Instruments Measuring Spirituality in Clinical Research
    Bert Garssen
    Anja Visser
    Eltica de Jager Meezenbroek
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2012, 27 : 401 - 401
  • [5] Instruments Measuring Spirituality in Clinical Research
    Garssen, Bert
    Visser, Anja
    Meezenbroek, Eltica de Jager
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (04) : 401 - 401
  • [6] Measuring Spirituality and Religiosity in Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review of Available Instruments
    Austin, Philip
    Macdonald, Jessica
    MacLeod, Roderick
    [J]. RELIGIONS, 2018, 9 (03)
  • [7] The development and psychometric properties of instruments measuring religious coping in clinical cancer research: a systematic review
    Al-Sharbati, Zena
    Adair, Pauline
    Rasmussen, Susan
    Al-Adawi, Samir
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 25 : 19 - 20
  • [8] Instruments measuring omophobia: A systematic review
    Faraci, Palmira
    Valenti, Giusy Davila
    [J]. PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE, 2020, 15 (02) : 293 - 331
  • [9] Instruments Measuring Fatalism: A Systematic Review
    Valenti, Giusy D.
    Faraci, Palmira
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (02) : 159 - 175
  • [10] Sense of coherence and religion/spirituality: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on a methodical classification of instruments measuring religion/spirituality
    Jeserich, Florian
    Klein, Constantin
    Brinkhaus, Benno
    Teut, Michael
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):