Assessment of Low Back Pain: Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Brief Pain Inventory

被引:3
|
作者
Song, Chen-Yi [1 ]
Chen, Chia-Hsin [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Tien-Wen [4 ]
Chiang, Hsin-Yu [5 ]
Hsieh, Ching-Lin [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Long Term Care, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Municipal Tatung Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, New Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Asia Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy, Taichung, Taiwan
来源
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIALS; VALIDATION; INTENSITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5014/ajot.2022.044420
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Importance: The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is one of the most widely used measures to assess pain and related impacts among patients with low back pain (LBP). However, its test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) have rarely been examined in patients with LBP, interfering with its utility. Objective: To investigate the test-retest reliability and MDC of the BPI among patients with LBP. Design: Repeated assessments design with a 1-wk interval. Setting: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in a hospital in Taiwan. Participants: Fifty-four patients with stable LBP conditions. Outcomes and Measures: The BPI has two subscales-Intensity and Interference-that assess pain intensity and pain interference, respectively. Their test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and MDCs were calculated. Results: The ICCs of the Intensity and Interference subscales were .62 and .76, respectively. The MDC values for the two subscales were 2.57 and 2.34, respectively. For the four Intensity items, the average-pain score had a higher ICC (.60) than scores on the other items (worst, least, and current pain, which had ICCs of about .40). Conclusions and Relevance: The results suggest that although the BPI is a commonly used measure of pain intensity and pain interference among patients with LBP, caution should be exercised in interpreting the Intensity subscale score and its item scores. What This Article Adds: The BPI is widely used to assess pain and related impacts on daily occupation and functioning among patients with LBP. This study provides information regarding its test-retest reliability. Moreover, the MDC values provide clinicians and researchers with the thresholds for determining real improvement (beyond random measurement error).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory in Patients With Low Back Pain
    Song, Chen-Yi
    Lin, Shih-Feng
    Huang, Chien-Yu
    Wu, Hung-Chia
    Chen, Chia-Hsin
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    [J]. SPINE, 2016, 41 (15) : E937 - E942
  • [2] Tapentadol ER for Chronic Low Back Pain: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Results
    Leslie, Harvey
    Shapiro, Douglas Y.
    Okamoto, Akiko
    Lange, Claudia
    Van Hove, Ilse
    Greene, Alison
    Etropolski, Mila
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 66 : S5 - S5
  • [3] Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional gait analysis in chronic low back pain patients
    Fernandes, Rita
    Armada-da-Silva, Paulo
    Pool-Goudaazward, Annelies
    Moniz-Pereira, Vera
    Veloso, Antonio P.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 42 (04) : 491 - 497
  • [4] Reliability and smallest detectable change of the Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in patients with chronic low back pain
    Vejlgaard, Camilla
    Maribo, Thomas
    Laursen, Johan Riisgaard
    Schmidt, Anne Mette
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 21 (04) : 809 - 813
  • [5] Assessing pain and pain-related fear in acute low back pain: What is the smallest detectable change?
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    Swinkels-Meewisse, Ilse J. C. M.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Vlaeyen, Johan W. S.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (04) : 242 - 248
  • [6] Assessing pain and pain-related fear in acute low back pain: what is the smallest detectable change?
    Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
    Ilse J. C. M. Swinkels-Meewisse
    Johan W. S. Vlaeyen
    Dirk L. Knol
    Henrica C. W. de Vet
    [J]. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2007, 14 : 242 - 248
  • [7] Effectiveness of pain assessment with use of the brief pain inventory with elders
    Mayo, C
    Spiering, M
    Messecar, D
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2004, 44 : 167 - 167
  • [8] Reliability and minimal detectable difference of pressure pain thresholds in a pain-free population
    Koh, Ryan G. L.
    Paul, Tracy M.
    Nesovic, Karlo
    West, Daniel
    Kumbhare, Dinesh
    Wilson, Richard D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 17 (03) : 239 - 243
  • [9] Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain
    Kovacs, Francisco M.
    Abraira, Victor
    Royuela, Ana
    Corcoll, Josep
    Alegre, Luis
    Cano, Alejandra
    Muriel, Alfonso
    Zamora, Javier
    Gil del Real, Maria Teresa
    Gestoso, Mario
    Mufraggi, Nicole
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (25) : 2915 - 2920
  • [10] Polish Brief Pain Inventory for Pain Assessment and Monitoring of Pain Treatment in Patients with Cancer
    Leppert, Wojciech
    Majkowicz, Mikolaj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 13 (06) : 663 - 668